Effects of visual-motor illusions with different visual stimuli on the sit-to-stand of people with hemiplegia following stroke: A randomized crossover controlled trial

Tanabe, Junpei; Amimoto, Kazu; Sakai, Katsuya; Morishita, Motoyoshi; Osaki, Shinpei; Yoshihiro, Nao; Kataoka, Tokuei

doi:10.1016/j.humov.2022.103021

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The sampling frequency of the digital camera was 240 Hz. We affixed five markers to key anatomical landmarks, including the acromion process, greater trochanter, lateral epicondyle of the femur, lateral malleolus, and the 5th metatarsal head, on the non-dominant side of the participants [ 22 , 27 , 28 ]. These markers were strategically placed to facilitate precise movement measurements for subsequent analysis.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The reliability of angle calculations using Tomoco-Lite has been previously reported with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.80 to 0.97 [ 37 ], indicating a high intratester reliability [ 37 ]. The trunk forward inclination angle was defined as the angle between the line connecting the acromion process and the greater trochanter and a vertical line [ 22 , 27 ] ( Figure 3 ). The ankle joint angle was determined as the angle formed by the line connecting the lateral epicondyle of the femur and the lateral malleolus, and the line connecting the lateral malleolus to the fifth metatarsal, as described in previous studies [ 22 , 27 ] ( Figure 3 ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Following this, we determined the initiation and conclusion points of the STS movements by adding twice the standard deviation to the mean angle of the 10 consecutive frames capturing the unchanged trunk forward inclination angle, as outlined in a prior study [ 39 ]. We computed the duration of the STS movement by dividing the number of frames needed for the three STS periods by 240, which corresponds to the sampling frequency (i.e., the number of frames required during the STS period/240) [ 22 , 27 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…We performed P-VMI and S-VMI on the paralyzed side of the ankle joint of hemiplegic patients and compared their effectiveness [ 27 , 28 ]. The results showed that P-VMI improved the dorsiflexion function of the paralyzed ankle joint more than S-VMI, resulting in a shorter STS duration.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The results showed that P-VMI improved the dorsiflexion function of the paralyzed ankle joint more than S-VMI, resulting in a shorter STS duration. However, these studies did not measure TA activity during the STS movement, and it is unclear whether VMI actually stimulates TA activity during the STS movement [ 27 ]. In addition, to date, no studies have measured and examined muscle activity in the effect of VMI on STS movement.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Effects of Visual–Motor Illusion via Image Videos Showing Increased Exercise Intensity on the Tibial Anterior during Sit-to-Stand Movement: A Study of Healthy Participants

Tanabe,

Amimoto,

Sakai

et al. 2023

Neurology International

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Visual–motor illusion (VMI) elicits kinesthetic sensation from visual stimulation. We have previously performed ankle motion VMI with resistance applied to the ankle joint on the paralyzed side (power-VMI (P-VMI)) and ankle motion VMI without resistance (standard-VMI (S-VMI)) to activate the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle in stroke-paralyzed patients and compared sit-to-stand (STS) durations, but these studies did not measure TA activity during the STS movement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different intensities of visual stimuli presented during VMI on TA and STS movement. Healthy right-footed adults (n = 18) observed two different VMI videos of ankle dorsiflexion, including S-VMI and P-VMI, with an observation time of 2 min each. STS movement was evaluated before and after watching each video. Each participant performed both S-VMI and P-VMI interventions on the same day. Only P-VMI enhanced the integrated electromyogram of the TA, increased the angular velocities of the trunk forward inclination and the ankle dorsiflexion, and shortened the STS duration. Our results indicate that P-VMI facilitates the activation of TA during STS, and we believe that we have clarified the intervention mechanism of VMI.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Effects of Visual–Motor Illusion via Image Videos Showing Increased Exercise Intensity on the Tibial Anterior during Sit-to-Stand Movement: A Study of Healthy Participants

Tanabe,

Amimoto,

Sakai

et al. 2023

Neurology International

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Differences in the early stages of motor learning between visual-motor illusion and action observation

Sakai,

Kawasaki,

Ikeda

et al. 2023

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The visual-motor illusion (VMI) induces a kinesthetic illusion by watching one’s physically-moving video while the body is at rest. It remains unclear whether the early stages (immediately to one hour later) of motor learning are promoted by VMI. This study investigated whether VMI changes the early stages of motor learning in healthy individuals. Thirty-six participants were randomly assigned to two groups: the VMI or action observation condition. Each condition was performed with the left hand for 20 min. The VMI condition induced a kinesthetic illusion by watching one’s ball-rotation task video. The action observation condition involved watching the same video as the VMI condition but did not induce a kinesthetic illusion. The ball-rotation task and brain activity during the task were measured pre, post1 (immediately), and post2 (after 1 h) in both conditions, and brain activity was measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. The rate of the ball-rotation task improved significantly at post1 and post2 in the VMI condition than in the action observation condition. VMI condition lowers left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and right premotor area activity from post1 to pre compared to the action observation condition. In conclusion, VMI effectively aids early stages of motor learning in healthy individuals.

show abstract

Supraspinal Activation Induced by Visual Kinesthetic Illusion Modulates Spinal Excitability

Okouchi,

Hirabayashi,

Nakashima

et al. 2024

Healthcare

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Repetitive passive movement (RPM) enhances reciprocal inhibition. RPM is more effective when performed rapidly and at wide joint angles. However, patients with limited joint range of motion may not receive the most effective RPM. Therefore, having an alternative method for performing RPM in patients who cannot perform actual exercise due to limited joint motion is necessary. This study investigated the effects of RPM on spinal excitability using a visual kinesthetic illusion. Participants included 17 healthy adults (7 women). Measurements were taken before, during, and immediately after the intervention. We established two intervention conditions: the control condition, in which participants focused their attention forward, and the illusion condition, in which participants watched a video about RPM. F-waves from the tibialis anterior and soleus muscles were measured, and F-wave persistence and F/M amplitude ratios were analyzed. Under the illusion condition, compared with the preintervention condition, the F/M amplitude ratio of the tibialis anterior increased by approximately 44% during the intervention (p < 0.05), whereas the F-wave persistence of the soleus decreased by approximately 23% from the immediate start of the intervention (p < 0.05). This study suggests that a visual kinesthetic illusion can increase the spinal excitability of the tibialis anterior, whereas reciprocal inhibition can decrease the spinal excitability of the soleus.

show abstract

Effects of visual-motor illusions with different visual stimuli on the sit-to-stand of people with hemiplegia following stroke: A randomized crossover controlled trial

Cited by 5 publications

References 57 publications

Effects of Visual–Motor Illusion via Image Videos Showing Increased Exercise Intensity on the Tibial Anterior during Sit-to-Stand Movement: A Study of Healthy Participants

Effects of Visual–Motor Illusion via Image Videos Showing Increased Exercise Intensity on the Tibial Anterior during Sit-to-Stand Movement: A Study of Healthy Participants

Differences in the early stages of motor learning between visual-motor illusion and action observation

Supraspinal Activation Induced by Visual Kinesthetic Illusion Modulates Spinal Excitability

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About