The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of kinesthetic illusion induced by visual stimulation to the paralyzed side ankle joint on the sit-to-stand of a hemiparesis stroke patient. [Participant and Methods] A 33-year-old male with left hemiparesis due to a right putamen hemorrhage participated. This study used the ABA' single-case design. Phase A and A' conducted only conventional physiotherapy. Phase B conducted kinesthetic illusion induced by visual stimulation and conventional physiotherapy. To create a kinesthetic illusion, a video image of the patient's ankle joint dorsiflexion movement on the non-paralyzed side was inverted and placed on the patient's paralyzed ankle. The patient observed this display for 5 min. We evaluated weight-bearing symmetry values during sit-to-stand, duration of sit-to-stand, trunk and ankle joint movement on the paralyzed side during sit-to-stand, active ankle dorsiflexion angle on the paralyzed side, and the composite spasticity score. [Results] The weight-bearing symmetry values, movement of the ankle dorsiflexion during sit-to-stand, active ankle dorsiflexion angle, and composite spasticity score were significantly improved in phase B as compared with phase A and the effect was sustained in phase A'. [Conclusion] Kinesthetic illusion induced by visual stimulation for a hemiparesis stroke patient affected the ankle dorsiflexion function, resulting in an improved asymmetry during sit-to-stand as assessed by weight-bearing symmetry values.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Visual-motor illusion (VMI) is an intervention to induce kinesthetic sensation from visual stimuli. We aimed to compare the effects of VMI of different visual stimuli on the paralyzed side ankle joint of stroke hemiplegic patients (hemiplegic patients) and to clarify their indication. We applied two types of VMI images of ankle dorsiflexion: ankle dorsiflexion without resistance (standard VMI (S-VMI)) and maximum effort dorsiflexion with resistance (power VMI (P-VMI)). Twenty-two hemiplegic patients were divided into two groups: Group A, which received S-VMI first and P-VMI one week later (n = 11), and Group B, which received P-VMI first and S-VMI one week later (n = 11). Immediate effects were evaluated. Outcomes were the dorsiflexion angle and angular velocity, degree of sense of agency (SoA), and sense of ownership. Patient’s characteristics of cognitive flexibility were assessed using the Trail making test-B (TMT-B). Fugl-Meyer assessment and the Composite-Spasticity-Scale were also assessed. P-VMI was significantly higher than S-VMI in SoA and dorsiflexion angular velocity. Additionally, the degree of improvement in dorsiflexion function with P-VMI was related to TMT-B and degree of muscle tone. Therefore, P-VMI improves ankle function in hemiplegic patients more than S-VMI but should be performed with cognitive flexibility and degree of muscle tone in mind.