2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of warming, grazing/cutting and nitrogen fertilization on greenhouse gas fluxes during growing seasons in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
41
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
7
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that warming resulted in an increase in NEE in the alpine meadow on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau in 2012 and 2014. This is consistent with previous results for alpine meadows on the plateau (Hu et al., ; Peng et al., ; Zhu et al., ). However, we found that warming had no significant effect on NEE in 2013.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results show that warming resulted in an increase in NEE in the alpine meadow on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau in 2012 and 2014. This is consistent with previous results for alpine meadows on the plateau (Hu et al., ; Peng et al., ; Zhu et al., ). However, we found that warming had no significant effect on NEE in 2013.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, the chamber method used to measure C flux cannot fully represent the natural C flux because of chamber had changed gas exchange. Nevertheless, above‐mentioned methods are acceptable in view of the fact that warming chamber (Klein, Harte, & Zhao, ; Walker et al., ) and chamber method measuring C flux (Chivers, Turetsky, Waddington, Harden, & Mcguire, ; Jiang et al., ; Zhu et al., ) have been widely used in grassland ecosystems. At last, we have relatively small database because of we cannot conduct continuous measurement for C flux in chamber warming method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repeated ANOVA measurements are in the supporting information; N 2 O flux is shown in Figure S4. However, the N 2 O flux of both control and warming conditions was low, showing a 2 year average of 203 μg m −2 d −1 and 37 μg m −2 d −1 during the thawing period for warming and control, respectively, in agreement with evidence from the Tibetan alpine grassland [ Wei et al ., ; Zhu et al ., ]. However, compared to N accumulation (225 g N m −2 in top 60 cm) under warming, the increase in N 2 O flux under warming was quite small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the assembled data sets presently available, we were not able to pinpoint the soil microbial mechanisms underlying positive temperature effects on N 2 O emission at a global scale (Figure 4) (Waghmode et al, 2018). Additionally, enhanced plant growth with increased temperature may increase inorganic nitrogen uptake by the plants, thereby reducing soil nitrogen availability for N 2 O production through nitrification and denitrification (Carter et al, 2012;Dijkstra et al, 2012Dijkstra et al, , 2013Pereira et al, 2013;Zhu et al, 2015). In some cases, plants prioritize aboveground growth in the face of increased temperature while reducing belowground carbon supply (Dieleman et al, 2012), which may limit denitrifier proliferation and thus N 2 O emissions.…”
Section: N 2 O Emission Stimulated By Increased Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%