2006
DOI: 10.1177/0092055x0603400404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Web-Based Instruction on Math Anxiety, the Sense of Mastery, and Global Self-Esteem: A Quasi-Experimental Study of Undergraduate Statistics Students

Abstract: To explore the effects of web-based instruction (WBI) on math anxiety, the sense of mastery, and global self-esteem, we use quasi-experimental data from undergraduate statistics students in classes assigned to three study conditions, each with varied access to, and incentive for, the use of online technologies. Results suggest that when statistics course requirements included the use of WBI techniques, such as Blackboard's (Blackboard Inc. 2001) digital drop box and online student discussion board, class level… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 73 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first way in which past research is limited is that many studies employ grades as predictors, as opposed to outcomes, of statistics anxiety (Baloğlu 2002;Walsh and Ugumba-Agwunobi 2002;Van Gundy et al 2006;DeCesare 2007;Chiou et al 2014;Condron et al 2018). Second, some past studies measured proxies for academic achievement, such as cardiovascular measures of anxiety during an exam (Papousek et al 2012) or expected, as opposed to actual, grades in the course (Van Gundy et al 2006;DeCesare 2007;Condron et al 2018). This limitation is especially important given that Hanna et al (2008) show that students' levels on the six STARS anxiety dimensions account for a larger proportion of explained variance in predicted test scores compared to actual test scores.…”
Section: Statistics Anxiety and Attitudes And Academic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first way in which past research is limited is that many studies employ grades as predictors, as opposed to outcomes, of statistics anxiety (Baloğlu 2002;Walsh and Ugumba-Agwunobi 2002;Van Gundy et al 2006;DeCesare 2007;Chiou et al 2014;Condron et al 2018). Second, some past studies measured proxies for academic achievement, such as cardiovascular measures of anxiety during an exam (Papousek et al 2012) or expected, as opposed to actual, grades in the course (Van Gundy et al 2006;DeCesare 2007;Condron et al 2018). This limitation is especially important given that Hanna et al (2008) show that students' levels on the six STARS anxiety dimensions account for a larger proportion of explained variance in predicted test scores compared to actual test scores.…”
Section: Statistics Anxiety and Attitudes And Academic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%