2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13199-020-00743-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Wolbachia infection on fitness-related traits in Drosophila melanogaster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, our work and others' suggests that identical w MelCS variants have different effects on D. melanogaster temperature preference depending on the host background [20,58,59]. Host genomes also modify Wolbachia titre [87], Wolbachia maternal transmission [88], components of host fitness [8992] and the strength of cytoplasmic incompatibility [9395].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, our work and others' suggests that identical w MelCS variants have different effects on D. melanogaster temperature preference depending on the host background [20,58,59]. Host genomes also modify Wolbachia titre [87], Wolbachia maternal transmission [88], components of host fitness [8992] and the strength of cytoplasmic incompatibility [9395].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent studies indicate that individuals infected with wMelCS prefer cooler temperatures than uninfected individuals (Truitt et al, 2019;Arnold et al, 2019; but see Hague et al, 2020), suggesting that Wolbachia-infected hosts may avoid higher temperatures to alleviate fitness costs resulting from bacterial infections. A new study of natural D. melanogaster populations from Ukraine infected with wMel and wMelCS found that the effect of bacteria on fitness components and stress-related phenotypes is highly condition-dependent and influenced by the host genotype (Serga et al, 2021). However, most work focusing on phenotypic effects of Wolbachia infections used highly inbred, long-term Drosophila lab strains, which were often generated by de novo introgression via backcrossing (Chrostek et al, 2013;Teixeira et al, 2008) or transinfection with non-native Wolbachia variants (Martinez et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, our work and others’ suggests that identical w MelCS variants have different effects on D. melanogaster temperature preference depending on the host background [20,57,58]. Host genomes also modify Wolbachia titer [82], Wolbachia maternal transmission [83], components of host fitness [8487], and the strength of cytoplasmic incompatibility [8890].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%