2019
DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of wolf pack size and winter conditions on elk mortality

Abstract: Elk (Cervus canadensis) are high‐profile game animals for many states in the western United States, yet over the past several decades some populations have experienced a persistent and broad‐scale decline in recruitment. Over this same period, gray wolves (Canis lupus) have become an integral component of many western landscapes and agencies are increasingly challenged to maximize hunting opportunities of ungulates via predator management while simultaneously ensuring wolf conservation. To better understand th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our estimates of survival were consistent with estimates of survival for elk in Colorado, Wyoming, and Washington, USA (76–85%; Bender et al 2006, Evans et al 2006, White et al 2006, McCorquodale et al 2011, Webb et al 2011). Survival of elk in Arizona, USA, was estimated at 89% (Ballard et al 2000), higher than our study; however, survival of elk in the region not subjected to harvest was 97%, consistent with our results and similar to other studies of survival when harvest was excluded (91%; Webb et al 2011, Horne et al 2019). Similarly, survival of unharvested adult females ranged from 95–100% in southern New Mexico, USA (Halbritter and Bender 2011), and 99% in Yellowstone when harvest was excluded (White et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our estimates of survival were consistent with estimates of survival for elk in Colorado, Wyoming, and Washington, USA (76–85%; Bender et al 2006, Evans et al 2006, White et al 2006, McCorquodale et al 2011, Webb et al 2011). Survival of elk in Arizona, USA, was estimated at 89% (Ballard et al 2000), higher than our study; however, survival of elk in the region not subjected to harvest was 97%, consistent with our results and similar to other studies of survival when harvest was excluded (91%; Webb et al 2011, Horne et al 2019). Similarly, survival of unharvested adult females ranged from 95–100% in southern New Mexico, USA (Halbritter and Bender 2011), and 99% in Yellowstone when harvest was excluded (White et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, in Alaska, wolf predation reduced the abundance of some moose and caribou (Rangifer tarandus) populations (Gasaway et al 1992, Boertje et al 1996. Across Idaho, wolf predation has limited adult and calf elk survival, albeit less so than mountain lion predation (Horne et al 2019). Within the Greater Figure 14.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in Alaska, wolf predation reduced the abundance of some moose and caribou ( Rangifer tarandus ) populations (Gasaway et al 1992, Boertje et al 1996). Across Idaho, wolf predation has limited adult and calf elk survival, albeit less so than mountain lion predation (Horne et al 2019). Within the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem in Wyoming and Montana, USA, Garrott et al (2005) documented that wolves had important population‐level effects on one elk population with an estimated 20% of the population being killed overwinter, resulting in declining elk population trends, whereas they predicted a nearby elk population incurred only a 4% loss due to wolves, resulting in no change in the elk population trend.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations