2021
DOI: 10.1111/rec.13420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of woody debris and cover soil types on soil properties and vegetation 4–5 years after oil sands reclamation

Abstract: Woody debris is a critical component of natural forests, with an important function in land reclamation to control erosion and enhance diversity and function of newly developing ecosystems. Combined with cover soils, woody debris can play a significant role in plant community development, as cover soil is a source of inexpensive and ecologically adapted propagules. As we develop woody debris application as a land reclamation tool, its impacts on cover soils over time need to be documented. This study assessed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soils at this area are dominated by organic Mesisols, with Fibrisols, Cryosols, and Orthic and peaty Gleysols. Other studies showed that the mineral soil in this region has a C:N ratio of 33.1 (0.7), sand percentage of 51.4 (1.0), silt percentage of 35.7 (0.6), clay percentage of 12.9 (0.6), and bulk density of 0.82 (0.06) mg m −3 [29]. The soil was sealed in pails and delivered to the University of Alberta.…”
Section: Soil Preparationmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Soils at this area are dominated by organic Mesisols, with Fibrisols, Cryosols, and Orthic and peaty Gleysols. Other studies showed that the mineral soil in this region has a C:N ratio of 33.1 (0.7), sand percentage of 51.4 (1.0), silt percentage of 35.7 (0.6), clay percentage of 12.9 (0.6), and bulk density of 0.82 (0.06) mg m −3 [29]. The soil was sealed in pails and delivered to the University of Alberta.…”
Section: Soil Preparationmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Findings from the study indicated that, while reduced TRD had no effect on soil nutrient availability or soil quality 5 years following reclamation, adding peat and biochar improved soil nutrient availability. The decrease in bulk density with amendment application reflects the increase in the total porosity of amended soils (Forsch et al, 2021;Page-Dumroese et al, 2016). Although bulk density was greater for TRD80 (1.3 g cm À3 ) than peat and biochar treatments, it was still lower than the pre-disturbance bulk density of 1.5 g cm À3 in the Ae horizon of the Orthic Gray Luvisolic soil at the site and remained within acceptable limits to support plant establishment and growth (Dlusskiy et al, 2017) Note: Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at α = 0.05 according to the Tukey multiple comparison procedure.…”
Section: Bulk Density Soc and Tknmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vegetation restoration is the most effective measure to control land degradation (Yu et al 2020). Vegetation restoration can improve the soil physical and chemical properties and improve the stability of degraded ecosystems, and its effect increases with time (Forsch et al 2021;Ferreira et al 2013). The rapid response of soil microorganisms to changes in the external environment is usually used as an important index to evaluate the degree of restoration of degraded ecosystems (Ye et al 2021;Chen et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%