2016
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2015.150406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects on Bone Repair of Osteotomy With Drills or With Erbium, Chromium: Yttrium‐Scandium‐Gallium‐Garnet Laser: Histomorphometric and Immunohistochemical Study

Abstract: The repair process of osteotomies created by the Er,Cr:YSGG laser, despite producing thermal damage to bone tissue, is comparable to that with conventional drills.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Immunohistochemically, the increase of OCN expression was confirmed in granulation tissue at 2 weeks. The result was consistent with a previous report that showed a significant increase of OCN in granulation tissue at lased sites, compared to bur-drilled sites, following osteotomy [21]. Therefore, upregulated gene expressions of osteogenic differentiation markers in granulation tissue are evidence of enhanced new bone formation in laser-treated bone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Immunohistochemically, the increase of OCN expression was confirmed in granulation tissue at 2 weeks. The result was consistent with a previous report that showed a significant increase of OCN in granulation tissue at lased sites, compared to bur-drilled sites, following osteotomy [21]. Therefore, upregulated gene expressions of osteogenic differentiation markers in granulation tissue are evidence of enhanced new bone formation in laser-treated bone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The use of Er,Cr:YSGG laser has a great potential in the hard tissues surgery; indeed Er,Cr:YSGG laser enables efficient resection of the maxilla without using conventional rotary instruments, as the laser produces a clear and precise cut with minimal injury to contiguous hard and soft tissues [6, 20, 23, 42, 43]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burs/drills vs lasers: Evaluation of evidence value in comparative in vivo studies [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69] suffers mainly from the wide range of different laser-systems used (Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG, CO2, femtolaser), laser-light delivery (free beam, optic fi bers) and lack of standardized protocols regarding focus-spot energy-density, pulse-rate and pulse-frequency used. There is not even moderate evidence (EV: 0,5, Table 1) for lasers to provide superior cutting performance on micromorphologic, microscopic and clinical level in vivo and most authors point out thermal damages and thermal bonenecrosis in histologic investigations.…”
Section: Group 3 (Experimental Studies In Vivo)mentioning
confidence: 99%