2001
DOI: 10.1026//0033-3042.52.3.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effekte des generischen Maskulinums und alternativer Sprachformen auf den gedanklichen Einbezug von Frauen

Abstract: Zusammenfassung. In der feministischen Linguistik wird angenommen, daß maskuline Bezeichnungen, die generisch benutzt werden (Bezeichnungen von Personen beiderlei Geschlechts durch die maskuline Form, wie z.B. die Wissenschaftler, die Studenten), weibliche Personen weniger vorstellbar oder sichtbar machen als männliche Personen. Verschiedene experimentelle Untersuchungen konnten diese Annahme für den englischen Sprachraum bestätigen. Für die deutsche Sprache existieren dagegen bislang sehr wenige Studien zu di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0
14

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
50
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…This practice has often been criticized by feminist linguists and psychologists (Stahlberg et al, 2007). In psychological research, numerous studies revealed that in German masculine generics evoke a male bias in mental representations even when their use is intended as neutral (Stahlberg and Sczesny, 2001; Sczesny et al, 2016). Moreover, several studies indicate that gender-fair language – sometimes also referred to as gender-neutral language (Sarrasin et al, 2012), gender-inclusive language (Stout and Dasgupta, 2011), gender-sensitive language (Savić, 2011), or non-sexist language (Douglas and Sutton, 2014) – leads to more cognitive involvement of women and can thus reduce or eliminate male bias in mental representations (e.g., Braun et al, 1998, 2005; Heise, 2000; Irmen and Linner, 2005; Stahlberg et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This practice has often been criticized by feminist linguists and psychologists (Stahlberg et al, 2007). In psychological research, numerous studies revealed that in German masculine generics evoke a male bias in mental representations even when their use is intended as neutral (Stahlberg and Sczesny, 2001; Sczesny et al, 2016). Moreover, several studies indicate that gender-fair language – sometimes also referred to as gender-neutral language (Sarrasin et al, 2012), gender-inclusive language (Stout and Dasgupta, 2011), gender-sensitive language (Savić, 2011), or non-sexist language (Douglas and Sutton, 2014) – leads to more cognitive involvement of women and can thus reduce or eliminate male bias in mental representations (e.g., Braun et al, 1998, 2005; Heise, 2000; Irmen and Linner, 2005; Stahlberg et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feminization is recommended to reduce the male bias in mental representations for grammatical gender languages (Hellinger and Bußmann, 2001; Moser et al, 2011). Besides the phonological and visual similarity to the feminine form, associations of feminized forms with political correctness and feminist ideas are assumed to increase the cognitive representation of women (Stahlberg and Sczesny, 2001). On the one hand, feminized forms produce a link between grammatical gender and gender of the designated person, leading to higher availability of female exemplars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although some data suggest that feminine-masculine word pairs increase female mental imagery (meaning more individuals who read the term picture women), others suggest that this approach also reinforces gender binaries. 24,25 Additionally, some argue that this feminization undervalues female versions by tacitly confirming that terms such as ‘professor’ are implicitly male. Attempts to feminize words using gender-specific stems (e.g.…”
Section: What Can You Do: Strategies To Avoid Gender Bias In Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Für den klinischen Alltag können die folgenden Empfehlungen ausgesprochen werden: Wir verwenden diese Sprachregelung überwiegend, aber nicht ganz durchgängig, weil es empirisch eindeutig erwiesen ist, dass die aktivierten kognitiven Muster bei der Verwendung des generischen Maskulinums einseitig bleiben [18].…”
Section: Schlussfolgerungenunclassified