1991
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1838(91)90045-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efferent connections of lobule IX of the posterior cerebellar cortex in the rabbit — some functional considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present data indicate that these areas mainly receive from the CVN relatively simple signals regarding head position or head velocity, at least during rotations in vertical planes. STC behavior and other complex responses were not obvious in a large majority of CVN neurons, despite the fact that this region receives considerable inputs from the uvula and nodulus in addition to projecting to these regions (Shojaku et al 1987;Patton et al 1991). An exception is the group of neurons that exhibited a large augmentation in response gain with increasing stimulus frequency, and which had response phases near stimulus velocity when low-frequency tilts were performed that lagged to near stimulus position during high-frequency rotations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The present data indicate that these areas mainly receive from the CVN relatively simple signals regarding head position or head velocity, at least during rotations in vertical planes. STC behavior and other complex responses were not obvious in a large majority of CVN neurons, despite the fact that this region receives considerable inputs from the uvula and nodulus in addition to projecting to these regions (Shojaku et al 1987;Patton et al 1991). An exception is the group of neurons that exhibited a large augmentation in response gain with increasing stimulus frequency, and which had response phases near stimulus velocity when low-frequency tilts were performed that lagged to near stimulus position during high-frequency rotations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…By way of fastigial projections to intralaminar thalamus (Okumura et al, 2001;Gonzaloruiz and Leichnetz, 1990;Larsell et al, 1972;Melik-Musyan and Fanardjyan, 1998), and pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPN; Hazrati and Parent, 1992), the vermis could provide behavioral state-dependent modulation of a critical gaiting region for BG, STN, and PPN (Kimura et al, 2004). The PPN issues collaterals back to the fastigial nucleus (Ruggiero et al, 1997) and is thought to be critical to the effects of fastigial electrical stimulation-evoked cerebrovascular waves coupled with EEG desynchronization (Fadiga et al, 1968;Golanov et al, 2000;Paton et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Anatomical tracing studies show that the pons, and particularly the parabrachial complex, is a target for descending inputs from the forebrain, hypothalamus, midbrain and cerebellum and also indirectly for reflex afferent inputs that arise from pulmonary and airway receptors, etc. Moga, Herbert, Hurley, Yasui, Gray & Saper, 1990; Allen, Saper, Hurley & Cechetto, 1991;Paton et al 1991). The parabrachial complex also has the appropriate reciprocal anatomical connections with the medulla to effect changes in both respiratory and cardiovascular activity (Saper & Loewy, 1980;Fulwiler & Saper, 1984; Krukoff, Harris & Jhamandas, 1993).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%