2022
DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of Naldemedine for Patients with Cancer with Opioid-Induced Constipation in Clinical Practice: A Real-World Retrospective Study

Abstract: The efficacy and safety of naldemedine for opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer has not been investigated in clinical practice. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study to assess the effects of naldemedine among 10 Japanese institutions between June 2017 and August 2019. We evaluated the number of defecations 7 days before and after naldemedine administration. A total of 149 patients (89 male) with a median age of 72 years (range, 38–96) were included. The performance status was 0–1, 2, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A multicenter retrospective study previously published by us evaluated the efficacy and safety of naldemedine for OIC in 149 patients with various cancer types (18). With regard to efficacy, the share of responders was 65.7%, with a significant increase in defecation frequency one week before and after naldemedine administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A multicenter retrospective study previously published by us evaluated the efficacy and safety of naldemedine for OIC in 149 patients with various cancer types (18). With regard to efficacy, the share of responders was 65.7%, with a significant increase in defecation frequency one week before and after naldemedine administration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who discontinued treatment within a week of naldemedine administration are also important in safety analysis, and even if discontinuation occurred within a week, adverse events and defecation frequency in the week after naldemedine initiation were counted and evaluated as a whole. The data for the 33 patients included in this analysis are part of the data in a previously published study (18). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, 34 patients were enrolled in this study ( Figure S1 ). The data of the 34 patients included in this study have been previously published [ 27 , 28 ]. Patient charts were reviewed for data on patient characteristics, response to naldemedine, and adverse events.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to date, those studies have been conducted on carefully selected patients with good performance status (PS) scores and adequate organ function, and no data have been reported on the efficacy and tolerability of naldemedine in patients with hepatobiliary pancreatic cancer. Although we previously evaluated the effectiveness and safety of naldemedine in combination with opioids in clinical practice [ 27 , 28 ], we did not adequately investigate its effectiveness in cancer patients with hepatobiliary pancreatic cancer. Furthermore, to date, there have been no reports focusing on the digestive system and hepatobiliary pancreatic cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17 However, previous phase III trials included carefully selected participants (e.g., Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [ECOG‐PS] ≤ 2, and a cancer condition expected to remain stable for the extent of the study), and data on predictive factors or the detailed course of adverse events were lacking for patients with thoracic cancer. We previously conducted a survey on the use of naldemedine in clinical practice, 23 , 24 but there was insufficient evidence of its efficacy in thoracic cancer. Specifically, there are insufficient data from clinical practice involving patients with thoracic cancer who have poor performance status (PS) or those that are elderly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%