2021
DOI: 10.21037/jtd-21-340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy in locally resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract: Background: Esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) patients with the potentially resectable disease most would experience relapse after surgery. Immunotherapy has been reported to improve the prognosis of advanced esophageal cancer and may be a new strategy to prevent this urgent condition's recurrence. We first evaluated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in patients with resectable ESCC.Methods: All patients with resectable locally advanced ESCC (clinical stage II… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
80
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(32 reference statements)
6
80
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding pathological response, previous studies exhibited that an R0 resection rate was 96.3% and a pCR rate was 33.3% in patients with locally advanced ESCC receiving neoadjuvant nivolumab and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy [ 9 ]. Likewise, in another study, pCR rate was 34.21%; meanwhile, R0 resection rate was 92.11% in locally advanced ESCC patients receiving neoadjuvant camrelizumab and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy [ 25 ]. In this present study, 5 (31.3%), 6 (37.5%), 3 (18.8%), and 2 (12.5%) patients reached TRG 0, TRG 1, TRG 2, and TRG 3, respectively; 31.3% patients had pCR; meanwhile, 93.8% patients were witnessed with R0 resection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding pathological response, previous studies exhibited that an R0 resection rate was 96.3% and a pCR rate was 33.3% in patients with locally advanced ESCC receiving neoadjuvant nivolumab and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy [ 9 ]. Likewise, in another study, pCR rate was 34.21%; meanwhile, R0 resection rate was 92.11% in locally advanced ESCC patients receiving neoadjuvant camrelizumab and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy [ 25 ]. In this present study, 5 (31.3%), 6 (37.5%), 3 (18.8%), and 2 (12.5%) patients reached TRG 0, TRG 1, TRG 2, and TRG 3, respectively; 31.3% patients had pCR; meanwhile, 93.8% patients were witnessed with R0 resection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] Moreover, anti-PD-1 agents combined with chemotherapy or chemoradiation was recently explored for neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced ESCC, which exhibited an acceptable therapeutic response and a low-toxicity profile. [13][14][15][16] Park et al reported that neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemoradiotherapy may not increase the operative risk or reduce the quality of radical dissection including lymphadenectomy. 17 The Phase 3 ESCORT study undertaken in China showed that camrelizumab, a novel IgG4-kappa PD-1 inhibitor, significantly improved overall survival of patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC compared with chemotherapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, camrelizumab plus anlotinib achieved a median PFS time of 8.2 months and a median OS time of 12.7 months in patients with advanced NSCLC who had been subjected to multiple failed lines of treatment ( 17 ). However, the use of camrelizumab as a neoadjuvant therapy in cancer lacks sufficient evidence, and only a limited number of reports have been published, including two studies on neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy with or without apatinib in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma ( 28 , 29 ), and one study on neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus lenvatinib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent a liver transplant ( 30 ). In detail, neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and S1 achieved a 33% CPR and 75% MPR in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma ( 28 ), while another study reported the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy involving camrelizumab plus chemotherapy, realizing a 34% CPR and 76% MPR in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma ( 29 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%