2002
DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2002.129312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of rosuvastatin compared with pravastatin and simvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia: A randomized, double-blind, 52-week trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
100
2
12

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
100
2
12
Order By: Relevance
“…90 (For further details of these studies, see Appendix 12. ) A further two studies of 6 months or longer were identified which compared the LDL-C-lowering efficacy of rosuvastatin (5 and 10 mg) with that of atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolaemia in northern Europe (study 4522IL/0026 125 ) and with that of pravastatin or simvastatin in similar patients in the USA (study 4522IL/0028 126 ). These studies did not report clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Direct Statin-statin Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…90 (For further details of these studies, see Appendix 12. ) A further two studies of 6 months or longer were identified which compared the LDL-C-lowering efficacy of rosuvastatin (5 and 10 mg) with that of atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolaemia in northern Europe (study 4522IL/0026 125 ) and with that of pravastatin or simvastatin in similar patients in the USA (study 4522IL/0028 126 ). These studies did not report clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Direct Statin-statin Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myopathy and hepatic damage are the two major but uncommon adverse events 8,9) . Acute pharmacokinetic studies have shown that Asians may have higher blood levels of rosuvastatin than Caucasians but whether this results in more adverse events has not been demonstrated…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that the LDL-C lowering effect of statins could be more prominent in Asians than in Caucasians, and that a relatively low-dose statin could be used to manage dyslipidemia in Korean patients with low-to-moderate risks [11,14]. The reported LDL-C level reduction rates in representative Caucasian studies were −35.7%±7.1% [3], −42.6%± 10.5% [4], −39.1%±9.0% [5], −52.1%±7.5% [4], −37.9%± 14.0% [6], and −26.0%±8.8% [7] for atorvastatin 10, 20 mg, rosuvastatin 5, 10 mg, pitavastatin 2 mg, and pravastatin 40 mg, respectively. A meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind statin trials showed similar findings with regard to the LDL-C level reduction rates such as 36.8% in patients treated with 10 mg of atorvastatin, 29.7% in patients treated with 40 mg of pravastatin, and 45.8% in patients treated with 10 mg of rosuvastatin [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/ AHA) guidelines on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults did not recommend specific treatment targets since most of the trials regarding statins and cardiovascular outcomes did not test for specific LDL-C goals [2]. In addition, ACC/AHA recommended a specific dose of statin based on lipid-lowering efficacy [2] from previous clinical trials [3][4][5][6][7]. In contrast, the current treatment guidelines for dyslipidemia recommended by the Korean Society of Lipidology and Atherosclerosis, the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences, or the Korean Diabetes Association, provide actual LDL-C target levels [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%