2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous trastuzumab and intravenous trastuzumab as part of adjuvant therapy for HER2-positive early breast cancer: Final analysis of the randomised, two-cohort PrefHer study

Abstract: Three-year EFS data following H SC and H IV treatment are consistent with those reported by previous trials for H in the adjuvant setting. The overall safety profile during adjuvant treatment was as expected.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
44
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
7
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the conduct of the BELIS study, no new safety signals were detected for trastuzumab SC. The observed safety profile of trastuzumab SC at home and in the hospital was comparable to the safety results of two randomized studies and the single-arm study SafeHer [9][10][11][12]16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…During the conduct of the BELIS study, no new safety signals were detected for trastuzumab SC. The observed safety profile of trastuzumab SC at home and in the hospital was comparable to the safety results of two randomized studies and the single-arm study SafeHer [9][10][11][12]16].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Observed differences in AE rates between trastuzumab SC and trastuzumab IV in the large PrefHer study were driven by injection site reactions. Adverse events rates were similar between trastuzumab SC (275/479 [57.4%]) and trastuzumab IV (58/478 [54.0%]) when injection site reactions were excluded [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If rapid cytokine release is enhanced by a fast and high Cmax, which is to be expected from a pharmacological viewpoint, subcutaneous administration may reduce the incidence as well as the severity of reactions. This has in fact been demonstrated for trastuzumab (63,64) and rituximab (65,66), but appears to come at the cost of a substantial number of patients experiencing injection site reactions (63)(64)(65)(66).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This shift should provide for preference-based selection of Herceptin over biosimilar products, as supported by data from prefHER study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01401166), in which 86% of patients preferred subcutaneous Herceptin over intravenous administration. [36][37][38] Anti-ErbB2 investigational products…”
Section: Trastuzumab Biosimilarsmentioning
confidence: 99%