2014
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dku390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of a reduced dose of darunavir/ritonavir in a cohort of antiretroviral-naive and -experienced HIV-infected patients: a medium-term follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, another study from clinical practice recently showed that “unconventional” DRV/r dosage led to sustained virological suppression in treatment‐experienced patients . However, these results should be confirmed in a larger population in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, another study from clinical practice recently showed that “unconventional” DRV/r dosage led to sustained virological suppression in treatment‐experienced patients . However, these results should be confirmed in a larger population in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this regard, recent findings demonstrated that patients receiving first‐line treatment with a high pre‐therapy viral load (especially in the context of viraemia >100 000 HIV‐1 RNA copies/mL) had a lower chance of achieving virological success . Furthermore, although different DRV/r dosages are recommended according to the patient's treatment history and the presence/absence of PI resistance , few data on the impact of DRV/r dosage on virological response are available from clinical practice .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of our retrospective study indicate that reduced dose antiretroviral regimens are effective in progressively decreasing immune activation similarly to standard cART [3,[13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…involving fewer drugs or lower doses have gained attention as they could help to reduce toxicity, reduce costs (therefore increasing access to the drug in developing countries), and improve convenience and patient compliance. A reduction in the daily dose of DRV/RTV from 800/100 to 600/100 mg q24h was demonstrated to be safe in virologically suppressed patients [24,25], as was a further reduction to 400/100 mg q24h [26,27]. Additionally, DRV 400 mg plus a NRTI backbone was found to be non-inferior to standard dose lopinavir plus a NRTI backbone [27].…”
Section: Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 94%