2001
DOI: 10.1007/s002990100375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of an intron-containing kanamycin resistance gene as a selectable marker in plant transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, transgenic cassettes introduced for heterologous expression in plant cells carry either prokaryotic genes or cDNAs of eukaryotic genes. Aside from processing of 5Ј introns used as transcriptional enhancers in monocot transgene cassettes (Callis et al 1987;Maas et al 1991) or introns used to Designations above the bars, single asterisk (*), double asterisks (**) and triple asterisks (***), correspond to statistically signiWcant diVerences at P = 0.05, 0.005 and 0.0001, respectively prevent A. tumefaciens expression of visual or selectable marker genes (Libiakova et al 2001;Vancanneyt et al 1990) minimal information is available on processing of introns from transgenic transcripts. Transgenic soybean events in which the co-expression of FRO2 was observed, accumulated both processed and unprocessed transcripts at approximately equal levels (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, transgenic cassettes introduced for heterologous expression in plant cells carry either prokaryotic genes or cDNAs of eukaryotic genes. Aside from processing of 5Ј introns used as transcriptional enhancers in monocot transgene cassettes (Callis et al 1987;Maas et al 1991) or introns used to Designations above the bars, single asterisk (*), double asterisks (**) and triple asterisks (***), correspond to statistically signiWcant diVerences at P = 0.05, 0.005 and 0.0001, respectively prevent A. tumefaciens expression of visual or selectable marker genes (Libiakova et al 2001;Vancanneyt et al 1990) minimal information is available on processing of introns from transgenic transcripts. Transgenic soybean events in which the co-expression of FRO2 was observed, accumulated both processed and unprocessed transcripts at approximately equal levels (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samsun) were obtained as had been described previously (Luka et al 1994). The heterozygous population of the T 1 generation of the transgenic line designated as PHYA antisense was used for the most of the experiments.…”
Section: Plants and Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cDNA was obtained by AMV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, USA) and oligo dT 18 primer. The PCR was performed by using LC Taq polymerase, high fidelity buffer (Fermentas/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania) and the following primers: NPTS (5'-CCTTGCTCCTGCCGAGAAAGTC TCC), NPTA (5'-CGGCAAGCAGGCATCGCCATGG GTC) for nptII gene (Libiakova et al 2001); CUCS (5'-TGCTCAGACATCTGTTGATGCG), CUCA (5'-TGA CCTAGGCTGTTGATCTCCG) for PHYA of Cucurbita pepo (GenBank accession number M15265) and ActS (5'-CATGGTATTGTCAGCAATTG), Act A (5'-CCA CGCTCAGTGAGGATC) for the potato actin gene (GenBank accession number X55749). Annealing was performed at 58 °С for nptII, at 55 °С for PHYA of Cucurbita pepo and at 48 °С for the potato actin gene.…”
Section: Rna-pcr Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The plantlets were cultivated at 20 ± 2°C with a day length of 16 h under 50 lE m -2 s -1 light intensity. Plants were cultured on basal MS medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962) according to Libiakova et al (2001). Leaf segments of 4-6 weeks old plantlets were transformed with Agrobacterium inoculum according to Moravčíková et al (2003).…”
Section: Potato Transformation and Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%