2020
DOI: 10.1111/aej.12432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of different irrigation activation systems on bacterial extrusion

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the quantity of extruded bacteria following with EndoVac, EDDY, EndoActivator (EA) and standard needle irrigation (SNI). Ninety teeth with a single root and canal were included in this study. Fifteen teeth were selected as the negative control group to confirm sterilization. Seventy‐five teeth were contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) for 4 weeks. Teeth were prepared and divided into five groups (n:15): EndoVac, EDDY, EA, SNI and positive control group… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Note that root canals can be irrigated by insertion of solutions into the RCS by means of syringes and needles, 9 or ultrasonic inserts 10,11 and mechanized systems, in line with the concept of apical negative pressure. [12][13][14] Studies have demonstrated increased efficacy of irrigating solutions with the use of ultrasonic inserts. 11,12 Apical negative pressure has also shown promising outcomes when compared to conventional irrigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 Note that root canals can be irrigated by insertion of solutions into the RCS by means of syringes and needles, 9 or ultrasonic inserts 10,11 and mechanized systems, in line with the concept of apical negative pressure. [12][13][14] Studies have demonstrated increased efficacy of irrigating solutions with the use of ultrasonic inserts. 11,12 Apical negative pressure has also shown promising outcomes when compared to conventional irrigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 Apical negative pressure has also shown promising outcomes when compared to conventional irrigation. [12][13][14] The scientific literature highlights that the preparation of oval and flattened canals can be influenced by some characteristics of the instruments, such as design, composition, kinematics, and taper. 15 Heat-treatment of NiTi alloys gives the instruments greater resistance to cyclic fatigue and flexibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EDDY was found to cause significantly more apical extrusion than ultrasonic, mechanical, and positive pressure agitation techniques [ 35 , 36 ]. Aydınet et al [ 37 ] reported that EDDY resulted in more bacterial extrusion, and there was no difference between EDDY, Standard Needle İrrigation (SNI) and EA in terms of bacterial extrusion. The efficacy of irrigation agents is enhanced by increasing the flow rate during dispersal into the complex root canal system in sonic activations [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to them, the use of a negative pressure system reduced PEP. According to Aydın et al, 21 EndoVac is a reliable irrigation system in terms of bacterial extrusion, and according to Buldur et al, 22 EndoVac has a better performance in removing the smear layer from the apical-thirds of root canals compared to conventional needle irrigation.…”
Section: Discussion On Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%