2008
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e3181897351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Distraction Osteogenesis for Mandibular Reconstruction in Previously Irradiated Areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reconstructive procedures involving the use of cartilage grafts are difficult cases due to lack of blood supply on the recipient bed and donor site requirements necessitate meticulous work. Therefore, in some situations, such as radiotherapy, which cause nutritional deficiencies in cartilage tissue, distraction may be an ideal solution for the repair of the defect as in DO [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reconstructive procedures involving the use of cartilage grafts are difficult cases due to lack of blood supply on the recipient bed and donor site requirements necessitate meticulous work. Therefore, in some situations, such as radiotherapy, which cause nutritional deficiencies in cartilage tissue, distraction may be an ideal solution for the repair of the defect as in DO [29,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30 However, the rare publications about it concern a few cases following cancer treated by interrupted mandibulectomy and radiotherapy, and report difficulties and failures.…”
Section: Bone Distractionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A variation of this with the use of combined iliac crest bone graft has been proposed by several authors [19,25]. Distraction osteogenesis has emerged as a form of autogenous bone replacement for the atrophic mandible as well as for segmental defects [32][33][34] and has even been suggested as a replacement technique for the mandibular condyle [24].…”
Section: Replacement Of the Temporomandibular Jointmentioning
confidence: 99%