2010
DOI: 10.1097/moo.0b013e32833a46ed
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mandibular reconstruction using nonvascularized autogenous bone grafting

Abstract: Although vascularized free flap reconstruction of mandibular defects has become the more common method of treating the postablative cancer surgery patient, there remain indications for nonvascularized reconstruction of mandibular defects as well as other techniques.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[1234] Today, this traditional technique for the reconstruction of the mandible is indicated mainly to bridge segmental defects of the mandible where adjuvant radiotherapy is not indicated after ablative surgery as well as the reconstruction of the condyle, wide palatal clefts and in preprosthetic surgery. [567]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1234] Today, this traditional technique for the reconstruction of the mandible is indicated mainly to bridge segmental defects of the mandible where adjuvant radiotherapy is not indicated after ablative surgery as well as the reconstruction of the condyle, wide palatal clefts and in preprosthetic surgery. [567]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most affected tissues, which functioning must be regained in such situations for normal limb performance is the bone. One possibility is an autogenous bone grafting when a bone fragments are translocated within the body of a patient 1, 2. However, this is not always possible and a degree of complication can reach up to 30% 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cases involving large defects and requiring a greater amount of graft, removal of grafts from extra buccal sites, such as calvarium, iliac crest, rib and tibia, are recommended. 24 We can still indicate the removal of the extra buccal graft in cases that involve access to multiple intraoral donor areas or that these areas are very close to the noble structures, such as the inferior alveolar nerve, the mental foramen and the dental roots; when the graft is removed, there may be no adequate margin of safety to withdraw the graft with the appropriate amount without causing permanent damage to the patient. 9 Among the extrabuccal donor areas, the calvarial region has been shown to be a viable, predictable and safe option to be used as a donor site bed for grafting, prior to the dental implant's placement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%