2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00440.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of escitalopram in patients with severe depression: a pooled analysis

Abstract: Escitalopram is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for major depressive disorder in both primary and specialist settings. This analysis compared the efficacy of escitalopram with citalopram in the treatment of patients with severe depression [defined as a score of > or =30 Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)]. Data from three clinical trials were used for this pooled analysis. A total of 506 severely depressed patients were included (169 received escitalopram, 171 citalopram and 166 placebo).… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(28 reference statements)
5
40
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, patients were moderately-to markedly-ill, and ended with having mild or no symptoms at all. This decrease was comparable with the therapeutic efficacy of escitalopram reported in several randomized, controlled, clinical trials (Burke et al, 2002;Gorman et al, 2002;Auquier et al, 2003;Lepola et al, 2003;Stahl et al, 2003;Goodman et al, 2005;Kasper et al, 2005;Llorca et al, 2005;Moore et al, 2005;Wade et al, 2005b;Kennedy et al, 2006). The study population consisted of a large, heterogeneous group of patients including 2% elderly patients and patients with psychiatric disorders, for which escitalopram is not officially registered.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initially, patients were moderately-to markedly-ill, and ended with having mild or no symptoms at all. This decrease was comparable with the therapeutic efficacy of escitalopram reported in several randomized, controlled, clinical trials (Burke et al, 2002;Gorman et al, 2002;Auquier et al, 2003;Lepola et al, 2003;Stahl et al, 2003;Goodman et al, 2005;Kasper et al, 2005;Llorca et al, 2005;Moore et al, 2005;Wade et al, 2005b;Kennedy et al, 2006). The study population consisted of a large, heterogeneous group of patients including 2% elderly patients and patients with psychiatric disorders, for which escitalopram is not officially registered.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Escitalopram has been termed a serotonin dual action antidepressant as it binds to both the primary site of the serotonin transporter and to the allosteric site, which increases the reuptake inhibition (Chen et al, 2005). The efficacy of escitalopram has been shown in controlled clinical trials in primary care and in specialist settings, for the treatment of depression (Burke et al, 2002;Gorman et al, 2002;Auquier et al, 2003;Lepola et al, 2003;Llorca et al, 2005;Moore et al, 2005;Wade et al, 2005b;Kasper et al, 2006;Kennedy et al, 2006) and anxiety disorders (Stahl et al, 2003;Goodman et al, 2005;Kasper et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Our study confirms that escitalopram is effective in the treatment of depression and is well tolerated [Burke et al, 2002;Lepola et al, 2003Lepola et al, , 2004Llorca et al, 2005;Moore et al, 2005]. Escitalopram 10 mg/day had comparable efficacy to fluoxetine 20 mg/day, based on the primary and secondary efficacy measurements (improvement in HAM-D-17 and MADRS total scores).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…58 The drug was shown to be more efficacious than placebo and as least as effective or better than citalopram, 22,[66][67][68][69] with an early onset of efficacy. 22,59 Differences between the two SSRIs seem to depend on the initial severity of the depressive symptomatology, given that escitalopram has shown superior antidepressive efficacy in severely depressed patients. 60,70 Nevertheless, opposite findings were also reported, suggesting methodologic flaws as a cause for the difference in efficacy between the two drugs.…”
Section: (Continued)mentioning
confidence: 99%