2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep26778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Indian polyvalent snake antivenoms against Sri Lankan snake venoms: lethality studies or clinically focussed in vitro studies

Abstract: In vitro antivenom efficacy studies were compared to rodent lethality studies to test two Indian snake antivenoms (VINS and BHARAT) against four Sri Lankan snakes. In vitro efficacy was tested at venom concentrations consistent with human envenoming. Efficacy was compared statistically for one batch from each manufacturer where multiple vials were available. In binding studies EC50 for all VINS antivenoms were less than BHARAT for D. russelii [553 μg/mL vs. 1371 μg/mL;p = 0.016), but were greater for VINS anti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At these concentrations antivenom failed to prevent the myotoxic effects of Sri Lankan Russell’s viper venom in-vitro . Although this may be due to the low efficacy of the antivenom against the myotoxins [39], testing higher antivenom concentrations was not possible due to the practical limitations of increasing antivenom concentration in the tissue organ bath environment without affecting the osmolarity of the physiological salt solution. It was therefore not possible to determine the efficacy of the Indian polyvalent antivenom to neutralise the myotoxic effects of Sri Lankan Russell’s viper venom, because such a large amount of venom was required to cause myotoxicity requiring very high concentrations of antivenom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At these concentrations antivenom failed to prevent the myotoxic effects of Sri Lankan Russell’s viper venom in-vitro . Although this may be due to the low efficacy of the antivenom against the myotoxins [39], testing higher antivenom concentrations was not possible due to the practical limitations of increasing antivenom concentration in the tissue organ bath environment without affecting the osmolarity of the physiological salt solution. It was therefore not possible to determine the efficacy of the Indian polyvalent antivenom to neutralise the myotoxic effects of Sri Lankan Russell’s viper venom, because such a large amount of venom was required to cause myotoxicity requiring very high concentrations of antivenom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the efficacy of seven antivenoms distributed in sub-Saharan Africa has been studied against the venom of Echis ocellatus using neutralization tests and antivenomics [91,93]. Similar assessments have been performed in Asia [138], Australia [139] and Papua New Guinea [79,132]. It is necessary to expand these efforts in order to generate a complete picture of the preclinical spectrum of efficacy of antivenoms in the world.…”
Section: The Need Of International Partnerships To Evaluate Antivmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation is despite the fact that all institutions had medicines needed for managing anaphylactic shock following anti-venom serum administration. However the efficacy of Indian anti-venom serum (VINS and BHARAT are used in SL) against SL snake venom is questionable [22]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%