2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with FIGO stage IB1 to IIA cervical cancer: An international collaborative meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
93
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
93
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of these advantages, NACT is used in up to 25% of cervical cancer patients in many parts of the world, such as Asia, Italy, and South America 6. On the other hand, there are several objections because for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) who do not response to NACT, the delay in curative treatment, the development of radio‐resistant cellular clones and cross‐resistance with radiotherapy may exert negative impact on patient survival 7. Given these controversies, NACT is not recommended as a routine treatment for LACC patients in current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice guideline 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of these advantages, NACT is used in up to 25% of cervical cancer patients in many parts of the world, such as Asia, Italy, and South America 6. On the other hand, there are several objections because for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) who do not response to NACT, the delay in curative treatment, the development of radio‐resistant cellular clones and cross‐resistance with radiotherapy may exert negative impact on patient survival 7. Given these controversies, NACT is not recommended as a routine treatment for LACC patients in current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice guideline 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance with this data, by using a neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the percentage of patients in need for adjuvant radiochemotherapy could be significantly lowered (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.98) [4]. …”
Section: Adjuvant Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Summarizing all previously mentioned published data on patients undergoing a neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the rate of complete resection was improved (OR 1.55, 95% CI 0.96-2.50; P = 0.07) [4]; the incidence of positive lymph nodes could be reduced (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40-0.73; P < 0.0001), as could the rate of patients with parametric infiltration (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.41-0.82; P = 0.002) and the probability of distant metastasis (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.45-1.14; P = 0.16) [4]. In accordance with this data, by using a neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the percentage of patients in need for adjuvant radiochemotherapy could be significantly lowered (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.98) [4].…”
Section: Adjuvant Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, it has previously been repeatedly shown that neoadjuvant chemotherapy is effective in decreasing the size of the tumor and the prevalence of lymph node involvement, especially the presence of micrometastases, 8 and therefore consequently diminishing the need for adjuvant treatment. 7,9 A combination of less radical surgery, together with less need for adjuvant radiotherapy, should result in a significant improvement in long-term morbidity and quality of life.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%