2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of preoperative uro-stoma education on self-efficacy after Radical Cystectomy; secondary outcome of a prospective randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of the present study suggested that, there are statistically correlation between quality of life and (practice & knowledge). This result was in agreement with the work of Jonsen et al [66] who reported that patient education interventions focusing on stoma care improve significantly self-efficacy in regards to independently change of stoma-appliance over twelve months postoperatively and positive impact on patient outcome. Bare and colleagues [67] also reported that limited knowledge in ostomy management and proper ostomy appliance can have an impact on patient outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The findings of the present study suggested that, there are statistically correlation between quality of life and (practice & knowledge). This result was in agreement with the work of Jonsen et al [66] who reported that patient education interventions focusing on stoma care improve significantly self-efficacy in regards to independently change of stoma-appliance over twelve months postoperatively and positive impact on patient outcome. Bare and colleagues [67] also reported that limited knowledge in ostomy management and proper ostomy appliance can have an impact on patient outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The registration status of five included trials was indeterminate (Cao, Tian, Chen, & Jiang, ; Cobbing, Hanass‐Hancock, & Myezwa, ; Jensen, Kiesbye, Soendergaard, Jensen, & Kristensen, ; Salameh et al, ; Valiee, Razavi, Aghajani, & Bashiri, ). When we checked the registration status of the Cobbing et al () trial, the registration number in the paper was not listed in the registry (South African National Clinical Trials Registry).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We checked the three registries (CTG, ANZCTRN, and ISRCTN) to try and find the registration number but could not identify the trial. We could not determine if three trials were retrospectively or prospectively registered given the information that was in the papers and the registry (Salamah et al ; Valiee et al, ; Jensen et al, ). One trial had two registration numbers (McCann, Songprakun, & Stephenson, ), we wrote to the authors asking for clarification but did not get a response.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The remaining 19 articles (representing 15 individual studies) were included in the review. Studies were published between 1989 [ 12 ] and 2017 [ 13 15 ] and were conducted in ten different countries; one was UK-based [ 14 ] (see Table 1 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%