Efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for Bulimia nervosa

Abstract

BackgroundBulimia nervosa (BN), a mental disorder that causes significant impairment, can be treated with psychological, pharmacological, nutrition-based and self-help interventions. We conducted a pre-registered meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy of these interventions in up to 19 different interventions.MethodsDatabase search terms were combined for BN and RCTs from database inception to March 2017. Abstinence from binge eating episodes, compensatory behaviors, the absence of a BN diagnosis and reduction of symptom severity were considered as primary outcome variables, reduction of self-reported eating pathology and depression served as secondary outcome variables. Retrieved RCTs were meta-analyzed using fixed and random effects models.ResultsRCT (79 trials; 5775 participants) effects post-treatment revealed moderate to large intervention effects for psychotherapy [mostly cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)] for primary outcome variables. Slightly reduced effects were obtained for self-help and moderate effects for pharmacotherapy. Similarly, psychotherapy yielded large to very large effects in regard to secondary outcome variables, while moderate to large effects were observed for self-help, Pharmacotherapy and combined therapies. Meta-analyses for the pre to post changes within group confirmed these findings. Additionally, follow-up analyses revealed the sustainability of psychotherapies in terms of large effects in primary outcome criteria, while these effects were moderate for self-help, pharmacotherapy, and combined therapies.ConclusionsMost psychological and pharmacological interventions revealed to be effective in BN treatment. Taking effect size, sustainability of the intervention, as well as the consistency of findings and available evidence into consideration, CBT can be recommended as the best intervention for the initial treatment of BN.

Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa—New Evidence-Based Guidelines

“…In line with DSM-5 [6], two new categories of eating disorders have been added to the revised guideline: the ‘Other Specified Feeding or Eating Disorders’ (OSFED), which also include the ‘Night Eating Syndrome’, and the ‘Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder’ (ARFID), which replaces the old category of ‘Eating Disorders Not Otherwise Specified’ (EDNOS). With regard to the therapeutic studies on AN [18], BN [19] and BED [20], meta-analyses were performed based on a systematic literature search and assignment of pre-determined quality indicators (evidence level I).…”

Review of the burden of eating disorders: mortality, disability, costs, quality of life, and family burden

“…This makes effective treatments the more important. For bulimia nervosa [ 2 , 3 ] and binge eating disorder (BED) [ 4 ], there are effective psychological treatments, especially cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT). However, for anorexia nervosa, a recent meta-analysis could not establish its efficacy over an active control condition [ 5 ].…”

Laboratory‐based interventions targeting food craving: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

“…In all these domains, a range of studies has been published, but there has been no systematic review or meta‐analysis with regard to the effectiveness of interventions targeting food craving. While we know from recent meta‐analyses that there are efficacious treatments for craving‐related eating disorders, these treatments typically include a wide range of different interventions. Notably, it is usually difficult to infer specific mechanisms of action from randomized controlled trials that evaluate manualized treatment programs.…”