1988
DOI: 10.1016/0264-410x(88)90107-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of rabies vaccines against Duvenhage virus isolated from European house bats (Eptesicus serotinus), classic rabies and rabies-related viruses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
5

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
33
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the calculation of relative potency for a given vaccine, such difference in death/survival rate strongly affects potency result and should be carefully evaluated with local isolates to prevent the possible failure of the vaccine. These differences in protection index indicate the effect of challenge virus on potency of a given vaccine in terms of local isolates which correlate with studies done by Badrane et al indicating that different phylogroups shows varying level of protection [17]. Studies done in USA also support this finding that neither pre-exposure vaccination nor conventional post-exposure prophylaxis using classical rabies based vaccine provided significant protection to rabies related viruses [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…According to the calculation of relative potency for a given vaccine, such difference in death/survival rate strongly affects potency result and should be carefully evaluated with local isolates to prevent the possible failure of the vaccine. These differences in protection index indicate the effect of challenge virus on potency of a given vaccine in terms of local isolates which correlate with studies done by Badrane et al indicating that different phylogroups shows varying level of protection [17]. Studies done in USA also support this finding that neither pre-exposure vaccination nor conventional post-exposure prophylaxis using classical rabies based vaccine provided significant protection to rabies related viruses [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Further studies based on the sequences of the nucleoprotein gene of four EBL established that these viruses can be further subdivided into two different genotypes of lyssavirus : genotype 5 (or EBL1) and genotype 6 (or EBL2) (Bourhy et al, 1992. Protection and seroneutralization experiments (Fekadu et al, 1988 ;Lafon et al, 1986Lafon et al, , 1988 and evaluations of the cellular immune response after vaccination (Celis et al, 1988 ;Herzog et al, 1991Herzog et al, , 1992Joffret et al, 1990 ;Perrin et al, 1991) have demonstrated the weak efficacy of conventional rabies vaccines of genotype 1 against infection by EBL1, EBL2 and DUV isolates. This has lead to public health concerns and to the possible need to develop more specific vaccines against other genotypes of lyssaviruses .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their spectrum of protection against the rabiesrelated viruses is variable (25,31). Pasteur virus (PV) elicits VNAbs against genotypes 1, 4, 5, and 6 but fails to protect against genotypes 2 and 3 (3,16,59). Differences also exist in the pathogenicity of virus strains; genotypes 1 and 5 are pathogenic for mice by the peripheral route, while genotype 3 is not (37).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%