2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.03.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Retromandibular Transparotid Approach for the Management of Extracapsular Subcondylar Mandibular Fractures Using 2-mm Titanium Miniplates: A Prospective Clinical Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also reported a salivary fistula in 2.3% of patients. Ghezta et al 25 In the current study, 11.4% of the patients had FNP, and the buccal branch was involved in all cases. Among them, 8.7% had a slight weakness (Grade II) and 2.9% had a moderate weakness (Grade III)…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also reported a salivary fistula in 2.3% of patients. Ghezta et al 25 In the current study, 11.4% of the patients had FNP, and the buccal branch was involved in all cases. Among them, 8.7% had a slight weakness (Grade II) and 2.9% had a moderate weakness (Grade III)…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…They also reported a salivary fistula in 2.3% of patients. Ghezta et al 25 reported 8% incidence of transient FNP involving the buccal and marginal mandibular branches using the retromandibular approach in 47 sub‐condylar fractures. All FNP recovered completely within 6 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only the intraoral approach (Silverman, 1925; Jacobovicz et al ., 1998), which does not necessitate transcutaneous incisions, is really free from these potential pitfalls. [ 25 ] The intraoral approach requires special instruments and training to utilize the endoscope (Loukota 2006), which is often difficult, relatively uncommon, and time-consuming while training. [ 26 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the subcondylar fractures, preauricular approach is too high to access below the sigmoid notch regions [ 6 ] and submandibular approach is too low to access the subcondylar regions [ 6 , 7 ] and requires extensive stretching the facial nerve branches and may cause transient facial nerve weakness [ 8 ] when exposing the lesions. The retromandibular incision is closer to the subcondylar fracture sites [ 7 , 9 ]; however, the retromandibular incision only may achieve a limited exposure [ 10 ]. Therefore, this case patient who had subcondylar fracture extending to the condylar neck region was treated with transparotid retromandibular incision extending to the preauricular earlobe lesion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%