2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03402-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of sequential radiation and chemotherapy in treating glioblastoma with poor performance status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the outcomes of the former study are getting more and more out of date and those of the latter have limitations related to a database review, both the Lamborn analysis and NCDP data showed negative results. [36,37] Notably, HRT was either not used or not evaluated. When SRT is used with concurrent chemotherapy, patients with KPS 70 have shown varying degrees of success in terms of survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the outcomes of the former study are getting more and more out of date and those of the latter have limitations related to a database review, both the Lamborn analysis and NCDP data showed negative results. [36,37] Notably, HRT was either not used or not evaluated. When SRT is used with concurrent chemotherapy, patients with KPS 70 have shown varying degrees of success in terms of survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A logical solution to improve tolerance to therapy for these patients would be sequential delivery of treatment. The Lamborn analysis and NCDP data (21,86) both showed disappointing results although the results of the former study are increasingly dated and the latter one has the drawbacks associated with a database review. Of note, HRT was either not used or not assessed.…”
Section: Patients With Poor Performance Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%