2006
DOI: 10.1136/thx.2006.064337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of speech pathology management for chronic cough: a randomised placebo controlled trial of treatment efficacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
206
0
15

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
206
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Both VAS as a subjective scale of cough severity, and Polish version of LCQ [18] showed significant improvement. These findings are similar to results published by other authors [6,19]. Interestingly, there was no change in cough responsiveness assessed by capsaicin challenge, and this is also consistent with results of other authors [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Both VAS as a subjective scale of cough severity, and Polish version of LCQ [18] showed significant improvement. These findings are similar to results published by other authors [6,19]. Interestingly, there was no change in cough responsiveness assessed by capsaicin challenge, and this is also consistent with results of other authors [19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This technique is adapted from the treatment of hyperfunctional voice disorders. The first studies concerning speech therapy techniques in treatment of CC came from the 80s of 20th century, while the first randomised trial was published in 2006 [6]. Speech therapy for CC is multifactorial intervention, which may include different elements: education about cough, identification of cough triggers, instruction on cough suppression techniques, breathing exercises, vocal hygiene and hydration techniques and sometimes some forms of counselling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Significant risk of bias was identified in one study 22 in the areas of randomization, concealment of allocation, blinding of the intervention and outcome assessments, and measurement the quality of life outcome. The intervention used in the study by Vertigan et al 23 was a speech pathology intervention and involved concealed random allocation, but treatment group and outcome assessments were unblinded.…”
Section: Study Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%