2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cegh.2020.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of supplementation of probiotics on maternal glycaemic control – A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the presence of heterogeneity was substantial, the point estimates for the majority of the included studies were in the same direction favoring probiotics. Our findings on FPG corroborated the previous meta-analyses [ 27 , 35 , 37 , 38 , 44 ] that reported the effects of probiotics on glycemic outcomes in GDM. By contrast, Han et al [ 43 ] reported no significant reduction in FPG after probiotics supplementation in women with GDM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the presence of heterogeneity was substantial, the point estimates for the majority of the included studies were in the same direction favoring probiotics. Our findings on FPG corroborated the previous meta-analyses [ 27 , 35 , 37 , 38 , 44 ] that reported the effects of probiotics on glycemic outcomes in GDM. By contrast, Han et al [ 43 ] reported no significant reduction in FPG after probiotics supplementation in women with GDM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Improvement in fasting serum insulin and HOMA-IR indicates the potential roles of probiotics in improving insulin sensitivity [ 41 ]. Ramanathan et al [ 38 ] reported that probiotics supplementation has favorable effects on FPG and insulin, but their analysis included pregnant women with and without GDM [ 38 ]. Meanwhile, our meta-analysis suggested that probiotics have no significant effect on lipid parameters, and our findings are in agreement with the results of previously published meta-analyses [ 39 , 40 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation