Background: The control of biofilm adherence on tooth surface has always been the keystone of periodontal therapeutic systems. However, prevalence of gingivitis suggest inadequacy of self-performed oral hygiene measures and need for adjunctive aid for mechanical plaque control. Oral rinses containing chlorhexidine, has been widely used however, with certain limitations. Herbal products have been used widely reflecting its action as alternative and complementary remedy. Hence, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate the antimicrobial and antioxidant efficacy of a Guava leaf extract based mouthrinse in patients with chronic generalized gingivitis as an adjunct to oral prophylaxis. Methods: Sixty subjects (n = 20) in compliance with the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to one of the 3 study groups i.e. Group A-0.15%Guava mouth rinse, Group B-0.2% Chlorhexidine (CHX) mouth rinse, Group C-Distilled water (placebo). All the participants received professional oral prophylaxis and were dispensed with experimental mouth rinses and instructed to use for period of 30 days. Clinical parameters such as gingival index, plaque index along with microbial colony forming units using plaque samples and antioxidant levels in saliva were estimated at baseline, 30 and 90 days' time intervals. Results: All 3 groups showed gradual reduction in GI, PI and microbial counts. Considering the mean scores of recorded parameters at the scheduled time intervals, notable changes were observed between chlorhexidine and guava mouth rinse compared to placebo group. Although there was improvement in the antioxidant status in all study participants, yet there was no statistically significant difference observed. Conclusion: Guava mouth rinse can be used as an empirical adjunct to professional oral prophylaxis owing to its multifactorial properties and favourable acceptance. However, long term studies need to be conducted to validate its use for an extended period of time. Trial registration: The clinical trial has been prospectively registered on 17th February 2017 by the Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI/2017/02/007898).
Background Eclampsia, an enigmatic multisystem complication of
pregnancy, is commonly defined as new onset of grand mal seizure
activity and /or unexplained coma during pregnancy or postpartum.
Eclampsia is associated with maternal deaths ranging from, 1.8% in
developed to 14% in developing countries respectively. The worldwide
incidence of delayed postpartum eclampsia is on an increasing trend ,
now at 16-18% ,of all eclamptic seizures. Objective To study the
clinical findings and morbidity, associated with postpartum eclampsia
and its correlation with neuroimaging- in our institute- SRIHER,
CHENNAI. Materials and methods This is a retrospective study from a
period of June 2016- June 2021 , in SRIHER, Chennai. Case records of all
patients with postpartum eclampsia were analysed. Results A total of 35
patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were studied, out of which
55% of patients were diagnosed with hypertension or preeclampsia
antenatally, and 45% presented as atypical eclampsia. In our
institution, Postpartum eclampsia commonly occurred in the age group of
26-30 years of age (51.4%) ; was common after LSCS (71.4%) ; most
commonly occurred immediate postpartum (42.8%), Most common prodromal
symptom was headache (77%), followed by blurring of vision (37%). Most
common MRI finding was PRES (69%). 17% patients required ICU care.
There was no mortality associated with postpartum eclampsia in the study
period. Conclusion This study emphasises that a high index of suspicion
and a multidisciplinary approach effectively reduces mortality and
morbidity associated with postpartum eclampsia. Neuroimaging is of
robust help in the diagnosis and management.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.