2020
DOI: 10.1590/1518-8345.4213.3377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of the complementary therapies in the management of cancer pain in palliative care: A systematic review

Abstract: Objective: to synthesize the knowledge and to critically evaluate the evidences arising from randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of the complementary therapies in the management of cancer pain in adult patients with cancer in palliative care. Method: a systematic review guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The search for articles in the MEDLINE, ISI Web of Knowledge, CENTRAL Cochrane, and PsycINFO databases, as well as the manual search, selection of studi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
14

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
35
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…If the disagreement persisted, a third reviewer (ETN) made a final decision. Using standardised forms, 40 41 42 43 two authors (LCL-J and EB) independently extracted data, and clarifications on the following four areas were requested from the study’s authors when necessary:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the disagreement persisted, a third reviewer (ETN) made a final decision. Using standardised forms, 40 41 42 43 two authors (LCL-J and EB) independently extracted data, and clarifications on the following four areas were requested from the study’s authors when necessary:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were extracted using pre-established tools (35)(36)(37)(38)(39) and included four domains: a) study identification, with data ...continuation evaluation of non-randomized clinical trials of interventions (41) . This tool is guided by seven domains of bias chronologically organized in three dimensions (pre-intervention, intervention, and post-intervention) and the interpretations of the domain level and general risk of biased judgement in ROBINS-I are classified into low, moderate, serious, or critical risk of bias (41) .…”
Section: Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para Lopes-Júnior et al (2020), durante o atendimento pediátrico, os profissionais da enfermagem devem considerar que são envolvidos, pelo seu paciente, em um mundo de desenhos, cores, fantasias, desejos, manias, em que a brincadeira é uma necessidade diária da criança, que não deve ser alterado pela hospitalização. Por participar desse planeta mágico, os profissionais de enfermagem acabam por multiplicar a sua rede de vínculos afetivos, o que pode não se restringir apenas a uma atuação profissional e partir para um lado emocional que envolve familiares, que pode gerar desequilíbrio emocional de ambas as partes (Rolim et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified