2020
DOI: 10.1042/bsr20202391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of tripterygium glycosides combined with ARB on diabetic nephropathy: a meta-analysis

Abstract: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the beneficial and adverse effects of tripterygium glycosides (TG) combined with angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) on diabetic nephropathy (DN). We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database up to June 2017. Weighted mean differenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our present meta-analysis, 26 clinical studies including 1824 subjects (939 in experiment group and 885 in control group) were included. we found the TGs groups howed signi cant effects in reducing 24-UTP (P < 0.05), elevating Alb (P < 0.05), reducing Scr (P < 0.05), elevating Ccr (P < 0.05), and increasing the total e ciency, when compared to the control group, which is the same as others meta-analysis [11,45,46] . However, TGs treatment had no obvious advantage in improving BUN (P > 0.05) and increasing ALT (P > 0.05), The adverse effects of bone marrow suppression is obvious in TGs group, there was signi cant effect in reducing WBC (P < 0.05), when compared to the control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In our present meta-analysis, 26 clinical studies including 1824 subjects (939 in experiment group and 885 in control group) were included. we found the TGs groups howed signi cant effects in reducing 24-UTP (P < 0.05), elevating Alb (P < 0.05), reducing Scr (P < 0.05), elevating Ccr (P < 0.05), and increasing the total e ciency, when compared to the control group, which is the same as others meta-analysis [11,45,46] . However, TGs treatment had no obvious advantage in improving BUN (P > 0.05) and increasing ALT (P > 0.05), The adverse effects of bone marrow suppression is obvious in TGs group, there was signi cant effect in reducing WBC (P < 0.05), when compared to the control group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Two meta-analyses ( Ren, et al, 2019 ; Wu, et al, 2020a ) evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of Tripterygium wilfordii/tripterygium glycosides combined with ARB/ACEI in the treatment of stage IV DKD. In the controlled trial (RCT), 1414 participants ( Ren, et al, 2019 ) were evaluated in detail, and another meta-analysis included 23 studies, including a total of 1810 DN patients ( Wu, et al, 2020a ).…”
Section: Tripterygium Wilfordii and Its Components: Triptolide Tripterygium Glycosidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two meta-analyses ( Ren, et al, 2019 ; Wu, et al, 2020a ) evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of Tripterygium wilfordii/tripterygium glycosides combined with ARB/ACEI in the treatment of stage IV DKD. In the controlled trial (RCT), 1414 participants ( Ren, et al, 2019 ) were evaluated in detail, and another meta-analysis included 23 studies, including a total of 1810 DN patients ( Wu, et al, 2020a ). Tripterygium wilfordii/tripterygium glycosides combined with ARB/ACEI significantly improved 24-h urinary total protein (24 h-UTP), urinary UAER, SCr, and albumin more than did ARB/ARB alone.…”
Section: Tripterygium Wilfordii and Its Components: Triptolide Tripterygium Glycosidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controversies exist between systematic reviews that focus on the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of TG in the treatment of DN. Some researchers believe that TG can improve some clinical indicators of patients with DN, such as 24 h-UTP and serum creatinine level (24)(25)(26), while others reached negative conclusions that TG can significantly induce adverse reactions in patients with DN (27,28), and even questioned whether TG can be used to reduce the serum creatinine level of patients (28).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%