2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2014.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of various five-day estrous synchronization protocols in sheep

Abstract: The objective of this study was to determine the effects of various estrous synchronization protocols utilizing the five-day controlled internal drug releasing (CIDR) In Experiment 1, overall days to estrus were greater (P ≤ 0.01) in U and P compared with C. In Experiment 2, overall days to estrus were greater (P ≤ 0.02) in U and P compared with G. In summary, the 5 d CIDR reduces the number of days required to bring ewes into estrus when compared to untreated ewes. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies also indicated that there are concerns with short-term protocols related to inconsistency in estrus response, increased interval to estrus, problems in pregnancy maintenance and prolificity. In these protocols, estrus cannot be precisely predicted, and the interval from CIDR removal to estrus may range from 60 to 108 h (Jackson, Neville, Mercadante, Waters, & Lamb, 2014). In this sense, long-term synchronization protocols have proven to result in shorter intervals from CIDR removal to estrus when compared with short-term protocols, presenting a most reliable response to pregnancy and prolificity results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies also indicated that there are concerns with short-term protocols related to inconsistency in estrus response, increased interval to estrus, problems in pregnancy maintenance and prolificity. In these protocols, estrus cannot be precisely predicted, and the interval from CIDR removal to estrus may range from 60 to 108 h (Jackson, Neville, Mercadante, Waters, & Lamb, 2014). In this sense, long-term synchronization protocols have proven to result in shorter intervals from CIDR removal to estrus when compared with short-term protocols, presenting a most reliable response to pregnancy and prolificity results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, long-term synchronization protocols have proven to result in shorter intervals from CIDR removal to estrus when compared with short-term protocols, presenting a most reliable response to pregnancy and prolificity results. Even indicating the need of a longer time to stimulate hormonal functions of ewes, the long-term protocol may provide more security to manage estrus synchronization and reproduction of ewes (Vilariño, Rubianes, & Menchaca, 2011;Jackson et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time to onset of estrus reported in the present study ranged from 25 to 36 h in ewes and 36 to 48 h in does following CIDR removal that is coincident with Didarkhah and Mesgaran (2013) who mentioned that the time to onset of estrus ranged from 28 to 55 h following CIDR removal. In this regard, Jackson et al, (2014) reported that the time to the onset of heat in short term CIDR synchronization in ewes and does was 60-108 hours. Our results were coincident with Hashemi et al, (2006) who found that long term synchronization protocol was associated with shorter interval required to onset of estrus compared to those of shorter term of CIDR in ewes and does.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a general principle, these effects of progesterone can be used in estrus synchronization protocols [46][47][48]. Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MAP), fluorogestone acetate (intravaginal sponge), melengestrol acetate, levonorgestrel, and intravaginal progesterone-releasing devices (CIDR and DICO) are used for estrus synchronization in sheep and goats [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55].…”
Section: Use Of Progesterone In Estrus Synchronization In Small Ruminmentioning
confidence: 99%