Purpose
Cost-effectiveness analysis of voriconazole compared with fluconazole, both with galactomannan monitoring, for prevention of invasive fungal infections (IFI) in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)
Methods
A decision analytic economic model was developed to estimate the drug costs associated with planned prophylaxis, supplemental prophylaxis, and empirical therapy and costs associated with treatment of suspected or documented IFI. We estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) at 6 months, 12 months, and lifetime. A bootstrap analysis was conducted to estimate the uncertainty of the clinical trial results.
Results
At 12 months, mean total fungal-infection-related costs were not significantly different for voriconazole prophylaxis than for fluconazole prophylaxis for a subpopulation with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) but were significantly higher for voriconazole prophylaxis for the study population and in a subpopulation of those with other underlying diseases. The cost per IFI avoided ($66,919) and the cost per life-year gained (LYG) ($5,453) were also lower for the AML subgroup than for the complete trial population ($812,990/IFI avoided; and dominated for cost/LYG). ICERs were more favorable for voriconazole at 6 months and when the generic price was used for oral voriconazole. Bootstrap analysis results for the cost per LYG showed that the probability of voriconazole being cost-effective is 33% for the complete study population and 85% for the AML subpopulation, for a maximum willingness to pay for 1 year of life gained of $50,000.
Conclusion
Voriconazole prophylaxis was significantly more costly than fluconazole for the complete study population but may be cost-effective for those undergoing an allogeneic HCT for AML. Use of generic oral voriconazole will have a favorable impact on the costs and cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis with voriconazole compared with fluconazole for all undergoing allogeneic HCT.