2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy, Safety, and Breakthrough Infections Associated with Standard Long-Term Posaconazole Antifungal Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients

Abstract: Based on favorable results from randomized clinical trials, oral posaconazole has been approved for prophylaxis in neutropenic patients and stem cell transplantation (SCT) recipients. However, routine use of a prophylactic drug may yield different results than those from clinical trials. We collected data on the efficacy, safety, breakthrough infections, and antimicrobial resistance associated with standard long-term posaconazole prophylaxis in adult allogeneic SCT recipients at the UCLA Medical Center. Oral p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The median trough posaconazole level among our patients (0.50 g/ml) was similar to levels described among HSCT recipients, as was the percentage of patients who did not achieve levels Ͼ0.5 g/ml (9, 10, 17). At the same time, however, factors that classically impact the absorption of posaconazole in HSCT recipients, such as mucositis, acute graft-versushost disease (GVHD), and chronic diarrhea, were not relevant in our patients (9,10,18). Rather, lower serum levels of posaconazole were correlated by multivariate analysis with concomitant receipt of PPI and higher levels with increased age and oral rather than tube feed administration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The median trough posaconazole level among our patients (0.50 g/ml) was similar to levels described among HSCT recipients, as was the percentage of patients who did not achieve levels Ͼ0.5 g/ml (9, 10, 17). At the same time, however, factors that classically impact the absorption of posaconazole in HSCT recipients, such as mucositis, acute graft-versushost disease (GVHD), and chronic diarrhea, were not relevant in our patients (9,10,18). Rather, lower serum levels of posaconazole were correlated by multivariate analysis with concomitant receipt of PPI and higher levels with increased age and oral rather than tube feed administration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This study estimated a rate of breakthrough IFIs at 6 months for those given posaconazole prophylaxis (7.5%) that was similar to the rate observed in the BMT CTN 0101 clinical trial for voriconazole (7.3%). 28 However, in the posaconazole observational study, only 7% of the study population had AML as the underlying disease, whereas in the BMT CTN 0101 clinical trial, 44% of the voriconazole prophylaxis arm had AML as the underlying disease. Thus, the available data are not sufficient to determine the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis with voriconazole and posaconazole in those undergoing allogeneic HCT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Na 106 pacjentów poddanych profilaktyce pozakonazolem w UCLA (University of California Los Angeles, USA) infekcje przełamujące (gł. Candida sp., n = 6) pojawiły się u pacjentów z czynnikami ryzyka gorszego wchłaniania leku, takich jak stosowanie inhibitorów pompy protonowej, biegunka czy mucositis [27]. Stosowanie worikonazolu jest ograniczone przez potencjalne toksyczności w zakresie skóry czy też układu nerwowego [28].…”
Section: Praktyka Kliniczna W Polsceunclassified