Prophylactic ganciclovir, started before transplant and continued after recovery of the post-transplant neutrophil count, reduces the incidence and severity of CMV infection in CMV-sero-positive bone marrow transplant recipients but is frequently associated with neutropenia.

Based on favorable results from randomized clinical trials, oral posaconazole has been approved for prophylaxis in neutropenic patients and stem cell transplantation (SCT) recipients. However, routine use of a prophylactic drug may yield different results than those from clinical trials. We collected data on the efficacy, safety, breakthrough infections, and antimicrobial resistance associated with standard long-term posaconazole prophylaxis in adult allogeneic SCT recipients at the UCLA Medical Center. Oral posaconazole (200 mg 3 times daily) was started on day 1 after SCT and continued until day 100. After day 100, posaconazole was continued in patients who still required corticosteroids for prevention or treatment of graft-versus-host disease. From January 2007 through December 2008, 106 consecutive patients received prophylactic posaconazole. Breakthrough invasive fungal infections on posaconazole occurred in 8 patients (7.5%) within 6 months after SCT; 3 additional patients developed invasive fungal infection after discontinuation of prophylactic posaconazole. The infective organisms were Candida (8 cases), Aspergillus (2 cases), and Aspergillus plus Coccidioides immitis (1 case). There were no Zygomycetes infections. Only 2 (both Candida glabrata) of 9 infecting isolates tested were resistant to posaconazole (minimal inhibitory concentration >1 μg/mL). Mortality from invasive fungal infection occurred in 4 patients (3.7%). Except for nausea in 9 patients, no clinical adverse event or laboratory abnormality could be attributed to posaconazole. Mean peak and trough plasma posaconazole concentrations were relatively low (<400 ng/mL) in neutropenic patients with oral mucositis and other factors possibly affecting optimal absorption of posaconazole. These results demonstrate that standard long-term oral posaconazole prophylaxis after allogeneic SCT is safe and associated with few invasive mold infections. However, breakthrough infections caused by posaconazole-susceptible organisms (frequently Candida) may occur at currently recommended prophylactic doses. Thus, strategies to improve posaconazole exposure, including the use of higher doses, administration with an acidic beverage, and restriction of proton pump inhibitors, need to be considered when using prophylactic posaconazole.

In a prospective, randomized, controlled trial, we compared sulbactam/cefoperazone with imipenem as empirical monotherapy for febrile, granulocytopenic patients; 101 patients received sulbactam/cefoperazone (2 g/4 g every 12 hours) and 102 patients received imipenem (500 mg every 6 hours). Documented infections were present in 40% of patients treated with sulbactam/cefoperazone (40 of 101) and in 39% of patients receiving imipenem (40 of 102). The number of pretherapy gram-positive pathogens (52 isolates) was twice the number of pretherapy gram-negative pathogens (26 isolates). The overall favorable clinical response rates for sulbactam/cefoperazone (91 of 103 patients, or 88%) and imipenem (84 of 104 patients, or 81%) were similar. Both drugs were generally well tolerated. However, diarrhea occurred more often in patients treated with sulbactam/cefoperazone (31 of 101 patients, or 31%, vs. 15 of 102 patients, or 15%; P = .007), while seizures developed only in patients receiving imipenem (0 of 101 patients vs. 3 of 102 patients, or 3%). Superinfections developed in 16% of patients in both study groups but were infrequently caused by beta-lactam-resistant gram-negative bacilli (two cases with sulbactam/cefoperazone therapy and six cases with imipenem). These results support the efficacy and safety of either sulbactam/cefoperazone or imipenem as empirical monotherapy for febrile granulocytopenic patients.

No abstract

No abstract