2014
DOI: 10.1504/ijeed.2014.065318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency and productivity of Greek higher technological educational institutions: an assessment over the period 2005-2009

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aristovnik and Obadić (2014) used DEA to investigate the educational efficiency provided in the secondary and tertiary education [32]. Tsamadias and Kyratzi (2014) measured changes in efficiency and productivity in the Greek public higher technological educational institutions from 2005 to 2009 by using input-oriented DEA to provide directories and indexes to management for improving the performance of their institutions [33]. Accordingly, total public expenditure in education (as a percentage of gross domestic product [GDP]) and total public expenditure on education per capita were selected as key input indicators [23,24,34]; whereas secondary school enrollment and higher education achievement were chosen as key output indicators [23,24].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aristovnik and Obadić (2014) used DEA to investigate the educational efficiency provided in the secondary and tertiary education [32]. Tsamadias and Kyratzi (2014) measured changes in efficiency and productivity in the Greek public higher technological educational institutions from 2005 to 2009 by using input-oriented DEA to provide directories and indexes to management for improving the performance of their institutions [33]. Accordingly, total public expenditure in education (as a percentage of gross domestic product [GDP]) and total public expenditure on education per capita were selected as key input indicators [23,24,34]; whereas secondary school enrollment and higher education achievement were chosen as key output indicators [23,24].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%