2011 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing 2011
DOI: 10.1109/ucc.2011.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency Assessment of Parallel Workloads on Virtualized Resources

Abstract: Abstract-In cloud computing, virtual containers on physical resources are provisioned to requesting users. Resource providers may pack as many containers as possible onto each of their physical machines, or may pack specific types and quantities of virtual containers based on user or system QoS objectives. Such elastic provisioning schemes for resource sharing may present major challenges to scientific parallel applications that require task synchronization during execution. Such elastic schemes may also inadv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The author deploys the conception of masterslave architecture to propagate data to reduce traffic. In [6], the author introduces method for resource scheduling which can be efficient in mitigating the impacts that influence application respond time and utilization of the system. In [7,8], the authors introduce the impact of data transmission delay on the performance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The author deploys the conception of masterslave architecture to propagate data to reduce traffic. In [6], the author introduces method for resource scheduling which can be efficient in mitigating the impacts that influence application respond time and utilization of the system. In [7,8], the authors introduce the impact of data transmission delay on the performance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobile Information SystemsInput: // service size (small or large), ct // service completion time (now or later), VM // VM capacity (occupied = not enough or not occupied = enough) Output: service delegation/management location // fog or cloud (1) If (Service Size = small) && (Service completion time = now) && (VMs capacity = enough) (2) THEN (3) Divide requested services to small chunk (4) Calculate the required no. of VMs (5) Assign these chunks to the assigned VMs for processing(6) else if (Service Size = small) && (Service completion time = now) && (VMs capacity = not enough) (7) THEN (8) Divide requested services to small chunks (9) Calculate the required no. of VMs (10) Obtain list of available VMs capacity in other fog/cloud environment from Services Monitor Server in cloud.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They use a master-slave architecture for propagation of data to reduce traffic. In [11], researchers demonstrate that some resource scheduling techniques can be effective in mitigating the impacts that negatively influence application response time and system utilization. Andreolini et al [16] and Fan et al [12] study the impact of data transfer delay on the performance but they do not evaluate bandwidth efficiency.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [17], Luo suggests a new idea of using cloud to improve mobile device's ability to face the performance challenges for low latency and high throughput of media data processing [12,18]. Delgado et al [19] innovate Hyrax that encourages using mobile devices as resource providers in CC platform; yet experiment is not integrated. In [20], the authors just concentrate on using partition policies to hold the effect of application on mobile devices, but they do not solve any other matter related to user mobility [21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%