Efficiency effects of tax deductions for work-related expenses

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may EFFICIENCY EFFECTS OF TAX DEDUCTIONS FOR WORK-RELATED EXPENSES AbstractIn this paper it is shown that allowing the deduction of work-related expenses has a strictly positive effect on tax efficiency only if two conditions hold jointly: (i) The expenses should be interpretable as real cost and (ii) the expenses should be required for increasing taxable income. Otherwise deductions are inefficient, neutral or ambiguous. Thus it is argued that the cost of commuting to work should not be deductible as commuting does not increase taxable income. The efficiency enhancing effect of deducting other expenses like educational ones or expenses for housework and child care is challenged on the grounds that these expenses are largely pecuniary costs.JEL Code: H21, H24.

Economic and Environmental Effects of Public Transport Subsidy Policies: a Spatial CGE Model of Beijing

“…Richter [11], for example, argued that subsidizing commuter traffic would be equivalent to taxing leisure and would thus stimulate labor supply. Borger and Wuyts [12] suggested that public transport subsidies could reduce the car travel demand, parking cost, and congestion issues as an embodiment of positive externalities.…”

Political Economy of Commuting Subsidies

“…The literature on commuting subsidies has largely followed two different strands. First, there is a number of studies which analyse the welfare properties of commuting subsidies, for instance, Brueckner (2003), Richter (2004), and Wrede (2000;2001;. Brueckner (2003) uses a spatial model like ours and finds that subsidising transport is inefficient (see also Fujita, 1989).…”

“…1 Focusing on the consumption-leisure choice, Wrede (2000) and Richter (2004) analysed tax deductions for work related expenses within a optimal-taxation framework. Deductions for commuting expenses are possibly second-best efficient if household production (of time) generates non-taxable pure profits.…”

The distributional effect of commuting subsidies - Evidence from geo-referenced data and a large-scale policy reform

“…Wrede (2003), Borck and Wrede (2005) and Richter (2006) provide theoretical contributions on how to design commuting subsidies to be efficient. The only papers considering the efficiency of the Germany's governmental commuting subsidy empirically (Weiss (2009) and Boehm (2013)) both provide evidence for commuting subsidies being efficient.…”