2019
DOI: 10.18462/iir.icr.2019.0547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency evaluation of borehole heat exchangers in Nunavik, Québec, Canada.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a very important topic to be addressed when deciding on a geothermal solution as well as when facing the environmental recovery of abandoned quarry lakes in defined hydrogeological contexts. In addition, this confirms the better performance of using a GWHP than a GSHP system, especially when a great heat exchange occurs, and the COP stands at around 4.00 at the end of the heating season [30][31][32][33], providing a total power of 2.410 MW. This also fits with the temperature profile inside quarry lakes, testifying to a well-defined stratification during summertime according to [33], where a higher temperature at the top (about 30 • C) and a lower temperature at the bottom (around 14 • C) occur.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a very important topic to be addressed when deciding on a geothermal solution as well as when facing the environmental recovery of abandoned quarry lakes in defined hydrogeological contexts. In addition, this confirms the better performance of using a GWHP than a GSHP system, especially when a great heat exchange occurs, and the COP stands at around 4.00 at the end of the heating season [30][31][32][33], providing a total power of 2.410 MW. This also fits with the temperature profile inside quarry lakes, testifying to a well-defined stratification during summertime according to [33], where a higher temperature at the top (about 30 • C) and a lower temperature at the bottom (around 14 • C) occur.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…According to [28], Ground Source Heat Pumps (GSHP) are more performant than Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHP), so that the Coefficient of Performance (COP) associated with heat pump systems is expected to be variable and low if fed with air, even if cheaper units can be installed [29]. On the other hand, among GSHP systems, it is possible to distinguish closed-loop systems (i.e., Borehole Heat Exchangers) and open-loop ones (i.e., groundwater, lake, river, and sea), of which the latter has the highest efficiency [30,31], also reaching a COP higher than 5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, several studies have assessed the geothermal potential and the economic viability of GCHP in Nunavik mostly focusing on the ground heat transfer aspects (see, for example, Refs. [5] to [9] introduced in the introduction). However, the present paper provides a new perspective by exploring more thoroughly the interactions between heat exchanges in the ground, electrical energy production and storage, and the behavior of the different components of the system during each simulation time step of a ten-year operation.…”
Section: J O U R N a L P R E -P R O O Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Giordano et al simulated vertical ground heat exchangers (GHE) for ten years. They showed that it was possible to extract 35 W/m from the ground for nine months of each year with 30 m-deep boreholes, when considering a minimum ground heat exchanger temperature of -10 °C [9]. Gunawan et al assessed the geothermal potential in the community of Kuujjuaq and performed an economic analysis of several energy scenarios [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%