2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02220.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of a phase 1 vaccine for the reduction of vaginal Coxiella burnetii shedding in a clinically affected goat herd

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

6
53
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
6
53
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacterial burdens in vaginal mucus and, to a lesser extent, in feces were also higher. These results are consistent with those previously obtained for sheep (17,20,21,35), goats (19,27,36), and cows (18). Low levels of C. burnetii DNA were also detected in milk (C T Ͼ30.5), which fits with the prevailing opinion among experts that sheep shed lower burdens of C. burnetii in milk than do cows and goats (3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Bacterial burdens in vaginal mucus and, to a lesser extent, in feces were also higher. These results are consistent with those previously obtained for sheep (17,20,21,35), goats (19,27,36), and cows (18). Low levels of C. burnetii DNA were also detected in milk (C T Ͼ30.5), which fits with the prevailing opinion among experts that sheep shed lower burdens of C. burnetii in milk than do cows and goats (3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Aborting females in particular release such large bacterial burdens into the environment that they may act as "superspreaders," according to Porten et al (49). Second, uninfected females, especially lambs and primiparous ewes, should be the primary targets of vaccination efforts in order to gradually immunize the entire flock (3,27,48,50). Finally, the viability of C. burnetii in litter and manure contaminated by infected birth products and feces may be reduced by composting such materials prior to their application (51,52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although this measure has been demonstrated to be efficient for small ruminants Astobiza et al, 2011), in cattle some questions still remain unclear. For example, when used in infected animals during the insemination period, vaccination does not prevent C. burnetii shedding (Guatteo et al, 2008;Rousset et al, 2009), questioning vaccination in adults. Notwithstanding, when cows in a recent study were vaccinated at the start of the third trimester of gestation, this measure proved safe and was related to an improvement of the subsequent fertility of the herd, especially when used in seronegative animals , despite the fact that vaccination during this period did not reduce shedding after parturition .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%