2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2023.114685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of CMV serodiagnosis during pregnancy in daily laboratory routine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification of antibodies against CMV-specific antigens has also been evaluated clinically because of their ability to differentiate between primary and established HCMV infections. Muller and colleagues 64 reported on the use of anti-p52 IgM and anti-gB IgG compared to routine IgG, IgM, and avidity assays during pregnancy to return “conclusive results” (i.e., susceptible to infection, acute primary infection, recurrent infection/reactivation, or past infection). These investigators found the use of anti-p52 IgM and anti-gB IgG produced conclusive results in 513/553 [92.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 90.3-94.7%] compared to routine IgG, IgM, and avidity testing 468/553 (84.6%, 95% CI: 81.4%-87.4%).…”
Section: Prenatal Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identification of antibodies against CMV-specific antigens has also been evaluated clinically because of their ability to differentiate between primary and established HCMV infections. Muller and colleagues 64 reported on the use of anti-p52 IgM and anti-gB IgG compared to routine IgG, IgM, and avidity assays during pregnancy to return “conclusive results” (i.e., susceptible to infection, acute primary infection, recurrent infection/reactivation, or past infection). These investigators found the use of anti-p52 IgM and anti-gB IgG produced conclusive results in 513/553 [92.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 90.3-94.7%] compared to routine IgG, IgM, and avidity testing 468/553 (84.6%, 95% CI: 81.4%-87.4%).…”
Section: Prenatal Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serological testing is often the reference diagnostic method for risk assessment in the prenatal/preconception field. The conventional approach of assessing the mother's immune status using HCMV-specific antibodies entails the detection of anti-HCMV IgG and IgM antibodies as well as, in the case of IgG positivity, the measurement of IgG avidity [47]. Furthermore, the assessment of donor and recipient HCMV serologic status prior to transplantations is currently used as a marker for latent infection and the subsequent risk for donor-derived transmission and immune competence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%