2017
DOI: 10.1007/s13595-017-0680-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of using spatial analysis for Norway spruce progeny tests in Sweden

Abstract: Key message Spatial analysis could improve the accuracy of genetic analyses, as well as increasing the accuracy of predicting breeding values and genetic gain for Norway spruce trials. Context Spatial analysis has been increasingly used in genetic evaluation of field trials in tree species. However, the efficiency of spatial analysis relative to the analysis using the conventional experimental designs or pre- and post-blocking method in Swedish gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, spatial autocorrelation values were medium and low in magnitude, which corroborates the findings of Paget et al. (2015) with potato and in Stringer and Cullis (2002) with sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.) but were much smaller than other studies (Dutkowski et al., 2002; Chen et al., 2018). The spatial autocorrelation values were influenced by the trait, that is, for TTY and MTY being higher than SG.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On average, spatial autocorrelation values were medium and low in magnitude, which corroborates the findings of Paget et al. (2015) with potato and in Stringer and Cullis (2002) with sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L.) but were much smaller than other studies (Dutkowski et al., 2002; Chen et al., 2018). The spatial autocorrelation values were influenced by the trait, that is, for TTY and MTY being higher than SG.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This improvement in error control varied according to the trait studied and was more pronounced for TTY and MTY and slightly smaller for SG. Dependence between different efficiencies and different traits has also been detected in similar studies (Chen, Helmersson, Westin, Karlsson, & Wu, 2018; Dutkowski, Costa e Silva, Gilmour, Wellendorf, & Aguiar, 2006; Paget et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…As already mentioned, an RCBD experimental design was applied in the progeny trial, in accordance with its frequent use in trials covering large physical areas with numerous individuals, including multiple individuals from each family, and large spacing between individuals, with significant between-microsite variation [49]. This experimental design and environmental variation lead to significant block (fixed) and spatial (random) effects on phenotypic performance.…”
Section: Spatial Analysis and Genotype Imputationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial autocorrelation is useful for analysing and examining randomness of residuals [67]. Moran’s I is commonly used for checking spatial autocorrelation and cluster detection which ranges between − 1 and 1 (Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moran’s I is commonly used for checking spatial autocorrelation and cluster detection which ranges between − 1 and 1 (Eq. (12)) [67]: where W ij is the spatial weight between i th and j th provinces; z i and z j are the values of z-score in i th and j th provinces, respectively; Y i is the number of cases for i th province; and S is the sum of all spatial weights. Moran’s I is used to determine the spatial autocorrelation of residuals for investigating the model deficiencies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%