2019 28th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icccn.2019.8846947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient 3D Placement of UAVs with QoS Assurance in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach is claimed to improve end-user quality of experience. An optimization algorithm based on particle swarm optimization has been explored to reduce total power consumed by base stations and optimizing quality of service in a UAV-based wireless communication system [35]. This algorithm is claimed to reduce deployment and operational costs, but does not consider quality of service in an aerial environment.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is claimed to improve end-user quality of experience. An optimization algorithm based on particle swarm optimization has been explored to reduce total power consumed by base stations and optimizing quality of service in a UAV-based wireless communication system [35]. This algorithm is claimed to reduce deployment and operational costs, but does not consider quality of service in an aerial environment.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To specify the optimal 3D UAV placement, both Air-to-Ground and Outdoor-to-Indoor path loss models are employed to optimize the data rates of indoor and outdoor users under a UAV transmit power budget. Meanwhile, the research in [182] focuses on the 3D UAV placement problem with QoS awareness in ad hoc wireless networks. The number of aerial base stations and transmit power of each station are jointly formulated and then solved by a PSO optimization algorithm in an iterative manner.…”
Section: B Uav Placement and Path Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides approaches that assume free-space propagation [8], a large number of works rely on the empirical model from [9]; see e.g. [10][11][12][13][14].The main limitation is that such models provide shadowing values in average scenarios, e.g. in a generic urban environment, but are likely to yield highly suboptimal placements in a specific environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%