2023
DOI: 10.3390/v15061344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient and Informative Laboratory Testing for Rapid Confirmation of H5N1 (Clade 2.3.4.4) High-Pathogenicity Avian Influenza Outbreaks in the United Kingdom

Abstract: During the early stages of the UK 2021-2022 H5N1 high-pathogenicity avian influenza virus (HPAIV) epizootic in commercial poultry, 12 infected premises (IPs) were confirmed by four real-time reverse-transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RRT)-PCRs, which identified the viral subtype and pathotype. An assessment was undertaken to evaluate whether a large sample throughput would challenge laboratory capacity during an exceptionally large epizootic; hence, assay performance across our test portfolio was investi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If sampling for live virus, we recommend cloacal swabs be taken in conjunction with oropharyngeal swabs (van den Brand et al 2018, Suarez et al 2000 because of possible differences in virus genotype detectability (Slomka et al 2023). Primary flight feathers can also be used as a diagnostic indication of systemic viral infection as infectious virus can be detected in these samples (Nuradji et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If sampling for live virus, we recommend cloacal swabs be taken in conjunction with oropharyngeal swabs (van den Brand et al 2018, Suarez et al 2000 because of possible differences in virus genotype detectability (Slomka et al 2023). Primary flight feathers can also be used as a diagnostic indication of systemic viral infection as infectious virus can be detected in these samples (Nuradji et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the significant number of UK commercial layer premises that have been affected by H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b HPAIVs since autumn 2021 [ 34 , 35 ], these in vivo investigations were carried out using a commercial layer breed. However, due to welfare considerations concerning the permitted housing density of the chickens, which is governed by their size (age), it was not possible to use adult point-of-lay hens; hence, 4-week-old layers were used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numbers of chickens in each transmission group are clearly very small compared with those observed during recent H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b HPAIV outbreaks in large commercial poultry premises, which have included spread within layer chickens in the UK [ 35 ]. James et al (2023) also investigated the chicken transmission of the clade 2.3.4.4b descendent H5N1-2021 HPAIV by using six chickens in the respective D0 and R1 groups, with initial infections carried out at different doses, along with an additional transmission attempt where 15 D0 and 15 R1 chickens were cohoused at a greater density [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an in vivo investigation, H5N6 HPAIV direct infection of pheasants initiated efficient onward transmission via introduced contact pheasants, despite high mortality [27]. H5Nx HPAIV caused high mortalities in farmed pheasants in the UK, Denmark and Finland during the 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 clade 2.3.4.4b epizootics, but very few infected wild partridges were reported [28–32]. Direct experimental inoculation of closely related chukar partridges ( Alectoris chukar ) with both the North American (2014) H5N8 and H5N2 clade 2.3.4.4 HPAIVs also caused mortality [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%