2013
DOI: 10.1364/oe.21.027371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient and intuitive method for the analysis of light scattering by a resonant nanostructure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

10
277
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(296 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
10
277
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a full 3D calculation the use of a PML may lead to more significant errors. For instance, using the approach of [8], a deviation of about 2% of the PF from the direct numerical evaluation of the GF was found [8,18] for an optical mode in a gold rod with cylindrical symmetry. It is also important to note that the derivation of the normalization in [8] uses a frequency-independent (nondispersive) PML, while in finite-difference time domain methods typically a dispersive PML is used to reduce numerical complexity.…”
Section: Appendix D: Comparison With Sauvan Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a full 3D calculation the use of a PML may lead to more significant errors. For instance, using the approach of [8], a deviation of about 2% of the PF from the direct numerical evaluation of the GF was found [8,18] for an optical mode in a gold rod with cylindrical symmetry. It is also important to note that the derivation of the normalization in [8] uses a frequency-independent (nondispersive) PML, while in finite-difference time domain methods typically a dispersive PML is used to reduce numerical complexity.…”
Section: Appendix D: Comparison With Sauvan Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) can be solved numerically by replacing the δ-like source term with a finite-size dipole at a given position r . The mode volume can then be evaluated by calculating numerically the EM field emitted at frequencies close to the pole of the GF under consideration using an iterative algorithm converging towards the pole, as has been recently shown [18]. Our approach is instead based on the exact form of the solution of Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the outgoing radiation conditions, the Hamiltonian of the system is non-hermitian and the normal modes of the system have complex eigenfrequencies ω µ [26,31,32]. Let us notice that a normalization condition of the kind V |E µ (r, ω µ )| 2 dV cannot be applied to normal modes with resonant complex frequencies ω µ because E µ (|r| → ∞, ω µ ) → ∞ [20,[26][27][28][29]33]. In this work, we define the normal modes associated to the eigenfrequencies ω µ following the normalization condition given in [28,34]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this scattered field is not the same field as the QNM and it cannot be properly normalized for use in quantum optics, e.g., for obtaining the Purcell factor and effective mode volume [12]-two well known quantities that help describe the underlying physics of cavity light-matter interactions. While some frequency-domain techniques exist for computing the QNMs of MNRs [18,19], it is highly desirable to be able to compute the QNMs using the commonly employed and general FDTD technique.The FDTD method is already widely used by the plasmonics community, and its accuracy for obtaining the enhanced field has been verified against other numerical techniques such as the multipole expansion technique [20]. In addition, the LDOS can be calculated by employing a dipole excitation source [21][22][23], which can also model local field effects, e.g., associated with finite-size photon emitters inside a MNR [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this scattered field is not the same field as the QNM and it cannot be properly normalized for use in quantum optics, e.g., for obtaining the Purcell factor and effective mode volume [12]-two well known quantities that help describe the underlying physics of cavity light-matter interactions. While some frequency-domain techniques exist for computing the QNMs of MNRs [18,19], it is highly desirable to be able to compute the QNMs using the commonly employed and general FDTD technique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%