2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iccvw.2015.38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient and Robust Inverse Lighting of a Single Face Image Using Compressive Sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Blanz and Vetter [9] proposed to estimate the ambient and directional light as a byproduct of fitting 3D Morphable Models (3DMM) to a single face image. Since then, several 3DMM based methods were proposed [2,25,17,30,33]. The performance of these methods rely on a good 3DMM of faces.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Blanz and Vetter [9] proposed to estimate the ambient and directional light as a byproduct of fitting 3D Morphable Models (3DMM) to a single face image. Since then, several 3DMM based methods were proposed [2,25,17,30,33]. The performance of these methods rely on a good 3DMM of faces.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist many approaches for lighting estimation from a single face image [6,30,17,25], however they are not learning-based and rely on complicated optimization during testing, making the process inefficient. Moreover, the performance of these methods (e.g., [6]) depends on the resolution of face images, and cannot give accurate predictions for low resolution images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, various methods are proposed to tackle illumination changes on human faces. The state-of-theart methods of face inverse lighting [7,40] usually fit the face region to a 3D Morphable Model [29] by facial landmarks and then render illumination. However, these methods are unsuitable to face thumbnails, because facial landmark cannot be detected accurately in such lowresolution images and erroneous face alignment leads to artifacts in the illumination normalized results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%