2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.04.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient arsenic removal by cross-linked macroporous polymer impregnated with hydrous iron oxide: Material performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The time for effluent concentration to reach the input concentration was 120 to 250 h, in comparison to 70 to 210 h when bismuth impregnated aluminum oxide was used for As removal [17]. The number of PVs to reach full breakthrough was 32 and 80 in this study, while the PV was 15 and 35 for As transport through columns packed with cross-linked macroporous polymer impregnated with hydrous iron oxide [18]. The total output volume with an effluent As concentration less than 10 ppb was about 450-550 mL.…”
Section: Column Results On As Removalmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The time for effluent concentration to reach the input concentration was 120 to 250 h, in comparison to 70 to 210 h when bismuth impregnated aluminum oxide was used for As removal [17]. The number of PVs to reach full breakthrough was 32 and 80 in this study, while the PV was 15 and 35 for As transport through columns packed with cross-linked macroporous polymer impregnated with hydrous iron oxide [18]. The total output volume with an effluent As concentration less than 10 ppb was about 450-550 mL.…”
Section: Column Results On As Removalmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Similar phenomena were observed by other researchers (Table S3). Zhang et al found that the diffusion of As (V) within the pores of the magnetite ACFs was more rapid than that of the raw ACF. Tawabini et al studied As (III) adsorption onto raw multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MCNTs) and iron oxide‐modified MCNTs (Fe‐MCNTs).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,25 Due to different properties of NC (32.4 m 2 g -1 ) and the synthesized materials, higher values for the specific surface area were obtained for both NC-PEG and NC-PEG/FO. Additionally, the shift of the pH PZC value indicated specific arsenate adsorption rather than electrostatic interaction, [25][26][27] as well as formation of complexed/precipitated arsenic species at the surface of the goethite based adsorbent. The determination of the iron content in an acidic extract, obtained by using 10 % nitric acid and microwave digestion, showed that 11.7 % of the iron was precipitated in goethite form at the NC-PEG surface.…”
Section: Textural Properties and Ph Pzc Of The Synthesized Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown in a previous work that the optimal pH for As(V) removal in a presence of goethite modified macroporous resin was 6-6.5, and this value was used in the present work. 26,27 The adsorption capacity was evaluated by using a non-linear regression method with commonly used isotherm models: Langmuir, Freundlich, Redlich--Peterson and Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R). The highest correlation coefficients were obtained by using the D-R equation for NC-PEG and Freundlich model for NC-PEG/FO (the data are given in Fig.…”
Section: Adsorption Study: Pollutants Removal By Nc-peg and Nc-peg/fomentioning
confidence: 99%