2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2011.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Bayesian inference for stochastic time-varying copula models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research in this direction is still at a rather early stage (see Ausin and Lopes (2010), Manner and Reznikova (2012) and Almeida and Czado (2012)). While the present work constitutes one of the first applications of vine copulas in dimensions 50 or higher (and, to the best of our knowledge, is the first to perform joint maximum likelihood estimation in such dimensions), dynamic (vine) copula models in such dimensions are not yet feasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Research in this direction is still at a rather early stage (see Ausin and Lopes (2010), Manner and Reznikova (2012) and Almeida and Czado (2012)). While the present work constitutes one of the first applications of vine copulas in dimensions 50 or higher (and, to the best of our knowledge, is the first to perform joint maximum likelihood estimation in such dimensions), dynamic (vine) copula models in such dimensions are not yet feasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(2012). We already covered six DGPs that were also analyzed by Almeida and Czado (2012). Instead of running their sampler we make the comparison with respect to these six cases.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several points which make the comparison slightly less reliable. First Almeida and Czado (2012) did not report exact computation times but they note that 100 000 iterations of their sampler take about 15 minutes. We use this number to calculate the AESR values from the effective sample sizes they report in their paper.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations