1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00127844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient decomposition and performance of parallel PDE, FFT, Monte Carlo simulations, simplex, and Sparse solvers

Abstract: In this paper, we describe the decomposition of six algorithms: two partial differential equations (PDE) solvers (successive over-relaxation [SOR] and alternating direction implicit [ADI]), fast Fourier transform (FFT), Monte Carlo simulations, Simplex linear programming, and Sparse solvers. The algorithms were selected not only because of their importance in scientific applications, but also because they represent a variety of computational (structured to irregular) and communication (low to high) requiremen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A relatively early work which is representative of this era is due to Stunkel (1988) who implemented both the dense standard simplex method and the revised simplex method with a dense inverse on a 16-processor Intel hypercube, achieving a speed-up of between 8 and 12 for small problems from the Netlib set (Gay 1985). Cvetanovic et al (1991) report a speed-up of 12 when solving two small problems using the standard simplex method, a result that is notable for being achieved on a 16-processor shared memory machine. Luo and Reijns (1992) obtained speed-ups of more than 12 on 16 transputers when using the revised simplex method with a dense inverse to solve modest Netlib problems.…”
Section: Parallel Simplex Using Dense Matrix Algebramentioning
confidence: 91%
“…A relatively early work which is representative of this era is due to Stunkel (1988) who implemented both the dense standard simplex method and the revised simplex method with a dense inverse on a 16-processor Intel hypercube, achieving a speed-up of between 8 and 12 for small problems from the Netlib set (Gay 1985). Cvetanovic et al (1991) report a speed-up of 12 when solving two small problems using the standard simplex method, a result that is notable for being achieved on a 16-processor shared memory machine. Luo and Reijns (1992) obtained speed-ups of more than 12 on 16 transputers when using the revised simplex method with a dense inverse to solve modest Netlib problems.…”
Section: Parallel Simplex Using Dense Matrix Algebramentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Numerical weather prediction, oceanography, study of air and water pollutants also requires the solution of parabolic PDEs to model the time-dependent climate behavior with respect to a number of parameters[ 161. These different classes of PDEs are typically solved using different numerical methods [9,14]. SPEED focuses on the parallel solution of parabolic PDEs, which are also known as time-dependent PDEs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequential numerical methods for solving time-dependent PDEs have been explored extensively [4], [SI. On the other hand, only a few attempts have been made toward parallel solutions using either transputers [7] or distributed-memory MlMD machines [2]. However, these parallel solu-tions are specific to particular kinds of problems and are not general in nature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%