2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00034-016-0349-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient Design for Radix-8 Booth Multiplier and Its Application in Lifting 2-D DWT

Abstract: In this paper, we present a regular partial product array (PPA) for radix-8 Booth multiplication by removing the extra row with a small overhead complexity. A radix-8 multiplier design is proposed based on the regular PPA which offers a saving of 10.7 % area-delay product (ADP) over the existing radix-8 multiplier design. The n lower-order bits of 2n bit output of full-width multiplier are truncated to have a fixed-width multiplier with low truncation error, where n is the operand bit-width. Few redundant logi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Design of the proposed work is done using Verilog HDL and the synthesis results are done in Cadence Genus of 90nm technology. The ASIC implementation results of proposed Radix8 Booth multiplier, CSD multiplier and Booth multiplier [16] are shown in Table 4 which shows parameters like delay, area and power. The ADP of the CSD architecture is 29.018% excess ADP (EADP) and for booth multiplier it is 28.22% EADP than proposed Booth multiplier and the PDP of the CSD architecture is 26.12% excess PDP (EPDP) and in booth multiplier it is 34.97% EPDP than proposed architecture are computed and it shows how much better performances does the proposed method gives than the existed method relating to area and power.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Design of the proposed work is done using Verilog HDL and the synthesis results are done in Cadence Genus of 90nm technology. The ASIC implementation results of proposed Radix8 Booth multiplier, CSD multiplier and Booth multiplier [16] are shown in Table 4 which shows parameters like delay, area and power. The ADP of the CSD architecture is 29.018% excess ADP (EADP) and for booth multiplier it is 28.22% EADP than proposed Booth multiplier and the PDP of the CSD architecture is 26.12% excess PDP (EPDP) and in booth multiplier it is 34.97% EPDP than proposed architecture are computed and it shows how much better performances does the proposed method gives than the existed method relating to area and power.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total number of hardware components used in the 2D DWT is shown in Table 3. Below table comprises of the total number of registers, XOR/XNOR, AND/OR/NOR/NAND gates and latency required for the implementation of the 2DDWT architecture for CSD implementation, Booth multiplier [16] and proposed architecture. The CSD implementation consumes more number of registers and the proposed architecture requires less number of registers.…”
Section: Proposed 2d Dwt Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Default are the remaining parameters). The architectures for multipliers based on 8-bit MLAC 4 and the recent roughly CMOS (45nm) [25] are not directly comparable with the plurality logic b.…”
Section: ×8 Mlams Using Two Mlamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike RPA-based designs, folded design involves simple control circuitry and it has 100 % HUE. Keeping this in view, several architectures based have been proposed for efficient implementation of lifting 2-D DWT [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Most of the designs differ by their number of arithmetic components, on-chip memory, cycle period and throughput rate.…”
Section: Two-dimensional (2-d) Discrete Wavelet Transform (Dwt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-pass block a (9,8) a (10,8) a (11,8) a (12,8) a (13,8) a (14,8) a (15,8) h (4,4) h (4,5) h (4,7) h (4,8) l (4,5) l (4,6) l (4,7) l (4,8) …”
Section: Row-processor Column-processormentioning
confidence: 99%